United States v. Jorge Palacio, 477 F.2d 560 (5th Cir. 1973). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Jorge Palacio, 477 F.2d 560 (5th Cir. 1973). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
7 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Johnson v. State, 2004 OK CR 23, 93 P.3d 41
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 561 cited at this page2 citing cases
  • Johnson v. State, 2004 OK CR 23, 93 P.3d 41.published 2 cites
    See U.S. v. Eldred, 588 F.2d 746, 752 (9th Cir.1978); U.S. v. Phillips, 540 F.2d 319, 332 (8th Cir.1976); U.S. v. Palacio, 477 F.2d 560, 561 (5th Cir.1973); People v. Austin, 185 Colo. 229 , 523 P.2d 989, 993 (1974); State v. Bynum, 282 N.…
  • United States v. Ricardo, 619 F.2d 1124 (5th Cir. 1980).published
    See United States v. Palacio, 477 F.2d 560, 561 (5th Cir. 1973); United States v. Ochoa, 543 F.2d 564, 566 (5th Cir. 1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Jorge PALACIO Et Al., Defendants-Appellants
72-3393.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Apr 27, 1973.
Published opinion
477 F.2d 560
George B. Weires, Miami, Fla., court-appointed, for Palacio., Martin Light, Brooklyn, N. Y., for Perez., Melvyn Kessler, Miami, Fla., for Cardenas., Robert W. Rust, U. S. Atty., Harold F. Keefe, Asst. U. S. Atty., Miami, Fla., for plaintiff-appellee.
Bell, Godbold, In-Graham, Per Curiam.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

The appellants here were involved in the alleged importation by boat into the United States through Miami, Florida, of approximately 3,625 pounds of marijuana. Their appeal is joint although each has separate counsel.

Appellant Perez was convicted under 21 U.S.C.A., § 963 of conspiring to violate Title 21 U.S.C.A., § 952(a); and also on the substantive charge of illegal importation of marijuana in violation of Title 21 U.S.C.A., § 952(a). The evidence was sufficient as to each of the counts. There is no merit in the claim that the jury system in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida is unconstitutional. United States v. Pentado, 5 Cir., 1972, 463 F.2d 355; United States v. Blair, 5 Cir., 1972, 470 F.2d 331; United States v. Gooding, 5 Cir., 1973, 473 F.2d 425. Nor is there merit in the additional claim that the trial court abused its discretion in allowing the jury to separate after having begun its deliberation. Tyler v. United States, 5 Cir., 1968, 397 F.2d 565.

Appellant Palacio was convicted on the conspiracy count in connection with the same marijuana transaction. His assignments of error are precisely those of Perez and are likewise without merit.

Cardenas appeals from his plea of guilty to possessing marijuna in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a)(1), on the single ground that the statute is unconstitutional. This ground is without merit. United States v. Lopez and Llerena, 5 Cir., 1972, 459 F.2d 949; United States v. Mather, 5 Cir., 1972, 465 F.2d 1035.

The convictions are Affirmed.