John J. Blake v. United States of Am., No. 73-3345 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enter., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. of New York, 5 Cir 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I, 489 F.2d 1402 (5th Cir. 1974). · Go Syfert
Search
John J. Blake v. United States of Am., No. 73-3345 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enter., Inc. v. Citizens Cas. Co. of New York, 5 Cir 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I, 489 F.2d 1402 (5th Cir. 1974). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 5 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Morrison v. State (texcrimapp, 1992-12-16)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Morrison v. State (2×)
Tex. Crim. App. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Carr v. Estelle, 489 F.2d 1402 (CA5 § 974) (pro se); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex.Cr.App.1974) (abuse of writ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
John J. Blake
v.
United States of America, No. 73-3345 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York, 5 Cir 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I
1402.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Feb 28, 1974.
489 F.2d 1402
Published

489 F.2d 1402

John J. BLAKE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America et al., Respondents-Appellees.
No. 73-3345 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5 Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir 1970,
431 F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 28, 1974.

John J. Blake, pro se.

John L. Briggs, U.S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., D. Frank Winkles, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tampa, Fla., for respondents-appellees.

Before WISDOM, AINSWORTH and CLARK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

1

The denial of the appellant's motion to vacate the sentence is affirmed, and we adopt the thorough opinion of the district court which accompanied that denial. It is apparent from a careful reading of the record and the transcript of the appellant's probation revocation hearing that probation was revoked only after a full, fair, and impartial hearing at which Blake was represented by counsel. Without deciding whether the decision of the Supreme Court in Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 1973, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656, should be applied retroactively, we are convinced by our examination of the record and the transcript that the requirements of that decision were fully met by the hearing held by the district court here.