Savage v. Nadler, 182 So. 80 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938). · Go Syfert
Savage v. Nadler, 182 So. 80 (Ala. Ct. App. 1938). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
SAVAGE
v.
NADLER Et Al.
7 Div. 349..
Alabama Court of Appeals.
Apr 5, 1938.
Published opinion
182 So. 80
1938 Ala. App. LEXIS 134
Culli & Swann, of Gadsden, for appellant., Inzer, Davis & Martin, of Gadsden, for appellees.
Rice.
Published
RICE, Judge.

■This appeal is from a judgment in favor of appellees in a suit brought against them, on an alleged joint contract, by appellant.

The case was tried by the court, sitting, without a jury. The rules of review are too well known to need re-statement.

The pleas were “in short by consent.” We are not sure that we understand, exactly, what is meant by that; but the issues that were litigated are simple and not difficult of comprehension from the record.

Appellees denied any joint contract; and claimed that all amounts due appellant by Mrs. Leak had been paid.

The evidence was in conflict; and we see no occasion to overturn the judgment rendered.

It is affirmed.

Affirmed.