Veasley v. State, 89 So. 927 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921). · Go Syfert
Search
Veasley v. State, 89 So. 927 (Ala. Ct. App. 1921). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Williams v. State (alactapp, 1921-06-07)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see, e.g." Williams v. State
Ala. Ct. App. · 1921 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, ante, p. 699, 89 South. 927 .
cited Cited "see, e.g." Williams v. State
Ala. Ct. App. · 1921 · signal: see also · confidence low
See, also, ante, p. 699, 89 So. 927 . *Page 700
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Veasley
v.
State.
5 Div. 338..
Alabama Court of Appeals.
May 17, 1921.
89 So. 927
Thomas L. Bulger, of Dadeville, for appellant., No brief reached the Reporter., Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State., No brief reached the Reporter.
Bricken.
Published
BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was indicted for manslaughter in the first degree, was convicted as charged, and the jury fixed his punnishment at five years in the penitentiary. Judgment and sentence rendered accordingly. This appeal is upon the record proper, without bill of exceptions. Upon examination of the record it is ascertained that all the proceedings were regular and no error appears. The judgment rendered in the lower court is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.