McLean v. State, 86 So. 117 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920). · Go Syfert
Search
McLean v. State, 86 So. 117 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
8 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
McLean
v.
State.
4 Div. 624..
Alabama Court of Appeals.
Jun 29, 1920.
86 So. 117
1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 178
McDowell & McDowell, of Eufaula, for appellant., No brief reached the Reporter., J. Q. Smith, Atty. Gen., and Lamar Field, Asst. Atty. Gen., for t’he State., No brief reached the Reporter.
Bricken.
Published
■BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment, charged the defendant with a violation of the act known as the “Weakley Bone Dry Law,” and' was properly framed under section 15 of said act. Acts 1919, p. 16, § 15. In short, the defendant was indicted and convicted of distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic-liquor.

The evidence was in conflict; therefore the only question presented upon this appeal, the refusal of ,the general affirmative charge for defendant, must fail, as the defendant was clearly not entitled to this charge.

The record is entirely free from all error. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.