Bradford v. State, 92 So. 17 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922). · Go Syfert
Search
Bradford v. State, 92 So. 17 (Ala. Ct. App. 1922). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bradford
v.
State.
6 Div. 855..
Alabama Court of Appeals.
Jan 17, 1922.
92 So. 17
1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 96
Horace C. Alford, of Birmingham, for appellant. The court erred in overruling demurrers to the affidavit and in refusing the charges requested. 17 Ala. App. 419 , 84 So. 883 . Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State. Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.
Merritt.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
MERRITT, J.

On appeal from the Jefferson county court of misdemeanor, to the circuit court, the defendant was convicted under a complaint which charged that he failed to dip his cattle after being warned to do so.

[*402] [1] There are certain demurrers set out in the record, but the judgment entry does not recite that they were presented to, considered, or acted upon by the court, and, this being true, this court cannot consider them. Birmingham, E. & B. R. R. Co. v. Hoskins, 14 Ala. App. 254, 69 South. 339; Yarbrough v. State, 15 Ala. App. 460, 73 South. 830.

However, the questions raised by the demurrers have been decided adversely to the defendant in the case of Williams v. State ante, p. 83, 89 South. 97.

[2] There is no bill of exceptions in the transcript; consequently, the court’s refusal to give certain written charges asked by the defendant will not be reviewed. 13 Mitehie’s Digest, 795; Moran v. State, 15 Ala. App. 379, 73 So. 748; Yarbrough v. State, 15 Ala. App. 460, 73 So. 830; Ward v. State, 15 Ala. App. 598, 74 So. 727; Graham v. State, 16 Ala. App. 87, 75 So. 635.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Affirmed.

<®=3Por other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes