Zambrano v. Marks, 515 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1975). · Go Syfert
Search
Zambrano v. Marks, 515 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1975). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
87 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 28 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In Re Upjohn Company Antibiotic\ Cleocin\" Products Liability Litigation" (mied, 1981-03-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1975 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1975 2000 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" In Re Upjohn Company Antibiotic\ Cleocin\" Products Liability Litigation"
E.D. Mich. · 1981 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Penn Central Commercial Paper Litigation, 62 F.R.D. 341, 343 (S.D.N.Y.1974), aff’d mem., 515 F.2d 505 (2d Cir. 1975).
discussed Cited "see" Liberty Mutual Insurance v. Pacific Indemnity Co.
W.D. Pa. · 1977 · signal: see · confidence high
The courts have agreed that the interest required must be a “direct, substantial, legally protectable interest in the proceedings,” Hobson v. Hansen, 44 F.R.D. 18, 24 [D.D.C.1968]; see 3B Moore’s Federal Practice ¶24.09-1[2] at p. 24-301 [1977], The interest must be a “present substantial interest as distinguished from a contingent interest or mere expectancy,” United States v. 936.71 Acres of Land, 418 F.2d 551, 556 (5th Cir. 1969). “[A]n interest, to satisfy the requirements of Rule 24(a)(2), must be significant, [and] must be direct rather than continent . . . ,” In re Penn C…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Zambrano
v.
Marks
74-2301.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Apr 23, 1975.
515 F.2d 505
Published

515 F.2d 505

Zambrano
v.
Marks

74-2301

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Second Circuit

4/23/75

1

E.D.N.Y.

AFFIRMED