Stanley Educ. Methods, Inc. v. The Becker Cpa Review Course, Inc., 539 F.2d 393 (5th Cir. 1976). · Go Syfert
Search
Stanley Educ. Methods, Inc. v. The Becker Cpa Review Course, Inc., 539 F.2d 393 (5th Cir. 1976). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
11 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Sue Richter v. Carnival Corporation (ca5, 2020-12-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Sue Richter v. Carnival Corporation
5th Cir. · 2020 · confidence medium
Review Course, Inc., 539 F.2d 393, 394 (5th Cir. 1976).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Fite v. AER MFG
5th Cir. · 1995 · confidence medium
Review, 539 F.2d 393, 394 (5th Cir. 1976). 6 While Fite readily admits that she never informed management of her harassment complaints, she argues that AER is liable as Johnnie Williams, her immediate supervisor (now dead), participated in the use of racial and derogatory language.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Phyllis Lazlo v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Company
5th Cir. · 1986 · confidence medium
Review, 539 F.2d 393, 394 (5th Cir.1976). 5 .
cited Cited as authority (rule) Jim Clark v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company
5th Cir. · 1985 · confidence medium
Review, 539 F.2d 393, 394 (5th Cir.1976); Alabama Great Southern R.R.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Aubrey L. Hart and Judy D. Hart, Cross-Appellants v. Dudley Walker, Cross-Appellee
5th Cir. · 1983 · confidence medium
Review Course, Inc., 539 F.2d 393, 394 (5th Cir.1976).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Rodney J. Hargrave v. Fibreboard Corporation, Nicolet Industries, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. Turner & Newall, Ltd., Third Party Alton Troy Fults, Nicolet, Inc., Third-Party Cross-Appellee v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation, Turner & Newall, Ltd., Third-Party Cross-Appellant
3rd Cir. · 1983 · confidence medium
Review Course, Inc., 539 F.2d 393, 394 (5th Cir.1976); Pierre v. United States, 525 F.2d 933, 936 (5th Cir.1976).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Hargrave v. Fibreboard Corp.
5th Cir. · 1983 · confidence medium
Review Course, Inc., 539 F.2d 393, 394 (5th Cir.1976); Pierre v. United States, 525 F.2d 933, 936 (5th Cir.1976).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
STANLEY EDUCATIONAL METHODS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
the BECKER C.P.A. REVIEW COURSE, INC., Defendant-Appellee
75-1155.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Sep 22, 1976.
539 F.2d 393
1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7010
E. Charles Bedsole, G. Brockett Irwin, Dallas, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant., . J. T. Vaughan, Jr., A. E. Aikman, Dallas, Tex., for defendant-appellee.
Dyer, Clark, Kraft.
Cited by 11 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

On petition for rehearing, Stanley’s substitute counsel argues that the case should be decided under the theory of promissory estoppel. See Wheeler v. White, 398 S.W.2d 93 (Tex.1965). This theory was not properly presented to the trial court for application to the facts, nor was it presented to this court until the unauthorized filing of substitute counsel’s supplemental brief. Under these circumstances, we ordinarily would not consider the new argument at the appellate level. However, we have examined the authorities cited in Stanley’s petition, especially Associated Tabulating Services, Inc. v. Olympic Life Insurance Co., 414 F.2d 1306 (5th Cir. 1969), and have found nothing in them to disturb our original conclusion that the actions of Becker were not undertaken with the intent to induce reliance on them by Stanley, without which promissory estoppel is no more applicable than equitable estoppel.

The petition for rehearing is

DENIED.