Strong v. City of Winter Park, 155 So. 652 (Fla. 1934). · Go Syfert
Search
Strong v. City of Winter Park, 155 So. 652 (Fla. 1934). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hope Strong
v.
City of Winter Park.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jun 9, 1934.
Published opinion
155 So. 652
1934 Fla. LEXIS 1491
George P. Garrett, for Plaintiff in Error; W. E. Winderweedle, for Defendant in Error.
Davis, Whitfield, Teeeell, Bufoed.
Published
Per Curiam.

A bill of exceptions taken in an action of assumpsit -states that:

“After having heard testimony for Plaintiff counsel for Plaintiff announced ‘Rest.’ Thereupon counsel for defendant moved for a directed verdict for defendant. After argument of counsel the Court indicated he would grant the motion. Whereupon counsel for plaintiff announced that plaintiff elected to take a ‘Non-Suit,’ and asked 90 days to prepare a Bill of Exceptions, and it was so ordered by the Court.”

No judgment appears in the record, therefore the writ of error must be dismissed. Mizell Live Stock Co. v. McCaskill, 57 Fla. 118, 49 So. 501; Dowling v. Weaver-Loughridge Lumber Co., 94 Fla. 1096, 114 So. 666. As to form of judgment on non-suit, see Spiker v. Hester, 101 Fla. 288, 135 So. 502.

[*229] Writ of error dismissed.

Davis, C. J., and Whitfield, Teeeell and Bufoed, J. J., concur.