Ramsey v. Ramsey, 193 So. 759 (Fla. 1940). · Go Syfert
Search
Ramsey v. Ramsey, 193 So. 759 (Fla. 1940). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Sauer v. Sauer, 19 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 1944)
How cited ↗
Cited for
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ethel Ramsey
v.
Joseph Gales Ramsey.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jan 30, 1940.
193 So. 759
1940 Fla. LEXIS 830
John F. Burket, Walter O. Marshburn, Middleton McDonald and Marvel, Morford, Ward Logan (of Wilmington, Delaware), for Appellant; Whitaker Brothers, for Appellee.
Terrell, Buford, Thomas, Wi-Htfield, Brown, Chapman, Compiled, Laws, Rules.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published
Terrell, C. J.

This appeal is from a final decree granting appellee a divorce from appellant on the ground of extreme cruelty.

[*666] It is contended that the allegations of the bill of complaint are insufficient to show the statutory residence required of complainant to bring such a bill, that no acts constituting extreme cruelty are shown and that the bill is otherwise insufficient to support a decree for divorce.

The test to determine the sufficiency of a bill of complaint to support a final decree of divorce for extreme ■cruelty was defined in the case of Diem v. Diem, decided by this Court January 5, 1940. The allegations of the bill in this case are sufficient to meet that test and the latter case concluded this one on that point.

On the question of residence, much evidence was taken, some of which is in conflict, but the chancellor held that the required residence was shown and we find no reason to reverse his finding.

His judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Buford and Thomas, J. J., concur. Wi-htfield, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Brown and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.