Ashcraft v. Flowers, 132 So. 698 (Fla. 1931). · Go Syfert
Ashcraft v. Flowers, 132 So. 698 (Fla. 1931). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
E. H. Ashcraft, as Receiver of Seminole County Bank, a Banking Corporation, Appellant, vs. C. L. Flowers, A. Kent Rossetter and Wife, Elizabeth Nix Rossetter, Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Co., a Corporation, and Truman Fertilizer Co., a Corporation, Appellees
Supreme Court of Florida.
Feb 27, 1931.
132 So. 698
Samuel R. Dighton, for Appellant; Ernest F. Housholder, for Appellees.
Buford, Terrell, Whitfield.
Published
Per Curiam.

This canse having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record of the decree herein, and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Court that there is no error in the said decree; it is, therefore, considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the said decree of the Circuit Court be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Buford, J.J., concur.