Mack v. State, 16 S.E.2d 519 (Ga. Ct. App. 1941). · Go Syfert
Search
Mack v. State, 16 S.E.2d 519 (Ga. Ct. App. 1941). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
21 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Dickerson v. State (gactapp, 1942-09-16)
Treatment trajectory · 1942 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1942 1984 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Dickerson v. State (2×)
Ga. Ct. App. · 1942 · signal: see · confidence high
See in this connection Mack v. State, 65 Ga. App. 812 ( 16 S. E. 2d, 519 ); Morrow v. State, 63 Ga. App. 264 ( 10 S. E. 2d, 762 ); Hightower v. State, 63 Ga. App. 265 ( 10 S. E. 2d, 765 ); Ransome v. State, 53 Ga. App. 490 ( 186 S. E. 436 ). 3.
Mack
v.
the State
29131..
Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Sep 19, 1941.
16 S.E.2d 519
1941 Ga. App. LEXIS 423
C. G. Battle, for plaintiff in error. Bond Almand, solicitor, John A. Boykin, Solicitor-general, Durwood T. Pye, contra.
MacIntyre, Broyles, Gardner.
Cited by 12 opinions  |  Published
MacIntyre, J.

1. There was testimony as to how the lottery <or “number game” is conducted, and chances sold on the guess for[*813] the winning number, which is determined by certain digits in the bond sales on the New York Stock Exchange for that day. This bond-sales report is made at two o’clock p. m., hence the tickets have to be turned in to the “pick-up man” before two o’clock. At about one o’clock on the day in question the defendant was walking up Hilliard Street in the City of Atlanta. The officers called to him and requested him to come over to the car. The defendant broke and ran. The officers ran after and overtook him, and found him trying to throw away a large number of lottery tickets. The ■evidence authorized his conviction of violating the lottery laws. Morrow v. State, 63 Ga. App. 264 (10 S. E. 2d, 762); Ransome v. State, 53 Ga. App. 490 (186 S. E. 436). For the method of operating the “number game” see Cutcliffe v. State, 51 Ga. App. 40 (179 S. E. 568).

2. The testimony of Wilbur as to the manner of operation of the lottery known as the “number game” was properly admitted. Lunsford v. State, 60 Ga. App. 537 (2, 6) (4 S. E. 2d, 113), and ■cit.

3. The lottery tickets were properly admitted in evidence. Lunsford V. State, supra, (6).

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Gardner, J., concur.