United States v. Cline, 566 F.2d 1220 (1st Cir. 1978). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Cline, 566 F.2d 1220 (1st Cir. 1978). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1999 · …even under the most expansive reading, the judge's order and the local rules cited therein will not support a claim that the district court's article iii decisional power had been delegated to the magistrate. ⚠ not in text
16 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Harvey Ellis Singletary, II v. B.R.X., Inc. (ca5, 1987-11-17)
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Harvey Ellis Singletary, II v. B.R.X., Inc.
5th Cir. · 1987 · confidence medium
Id.; United States v. Cline, 566 F.2d 1220, 1221 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Haley, 541 F.2d 678 (8th Cir.1974).
cited Cited as authority (rule) United States v. Will Renfro
5th Cir. · 1980 · confidence medium
Id.; United States v. Cline, 566 F.2d 1220, 1221 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. Haley, 541 F.2d 678 (8th Cir. 1974).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Bevans
8th Cir. · 2007 · signal: accord · confidence high
United States v. Haley, 541 F.2d 678, 678 (8th Cir.1974); accord United States v. Cline, 566 F.2d 1220, 1221 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Reeds, 552 F.2d 170, 171 (7th Cir.1977) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Jane Bevans
8th Cir. · 2007 · signal: accord · confidence high
United States v. Haley, 541 F.2d 678, 678 (8th Cir. 1974); accord United States v. Cline, 566 F.2d 1220, 1221 (5th Cir. 1978); United States v. Reeds, 552 F.2d 170, 171 (7th Cir. 1977) (per curiam).
discussed Cited "see" United States v. Bell (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
N.D. Cal. · 1999 · signal: see · confidence high
See id. at 853 (citing Cline, 566 F.2d 1220 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Haley, 541 F.2d 678 (8th Cir.1974)).
cited Cited "see" Kelly Kendall v. William Davis, Paul Dean, and Harry Huge, Trustees of the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Funds of 1950
5th Cir. · 1978 · signal: see · confidence high
See United States v. Cline, 566 F.2d 1220 (1978), citing United States v. Haley, 541 F.2d 678 (8th Cir. 1974).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Strong v. United States
N.D. Cal. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
“Even under the most expansive reading, the judge’s order and the local rules cited therein will not support a claim that the district court’s Article III decisional power had been delegated to the magistrate.” Id. at 818; see also United States v. Cline, 566 F.2d 1220 (5th Cir.1978) (court lacks jurisdiction to hear appeal from decision of *912 magistrate judge enforcing IRS summons); Aluminum Co., 663 F.2d at 502 n. 8 (where dispositive matter such as petition to quash administrative search warrant is referred under § 636(b)(3), de novo review required). 2 Regardless of the specific…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
United States of America and Charles T. Wilson, Revenue Agent Internal Revenue Service
v.
Frederic G. Cline and First Bank of Clayton County, Terry A. Lyle, Intervenor-Appellant
77-2805.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Jan 19, 1978.
566 F.2d 1220
1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12983
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

566 F.2d 1220

78-2 USTC P 9516

UNITED STATES of America and Charles T. Wilson, Revenue
Agent Internal Revenue Service, Petitioners-Appellees,
v.
Frederic G. CLINE and First Bank of Clayton County, Respondents,
Terry A. Lyle, Intervenor-Appellant.

No. 77-2805.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.

Jan. 19, 1978.

Sherman Johnson, Asst. U. S. Atty., William Turnipseed, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., M. Carr Ferguson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Gilbert Andrews, Chief-Appellate Sec., Dept. of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, D. C., for petitioners-appellees.

Kenneth Kilpatrick, Morrow, Ga., for respondents.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.

Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and THORNBERRY and RONEY, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

1

IT IS ORDERED that appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED.

2

Taxpayer Lyle, intervenor-appellant, appeals from an Order entered by the United States Magistrate enforcing a summons to produce certain documents to the Internal Revenue Service.

3

This Court is without jurisdiction to hear appeals from decisions of the United States Magistrates. See, e. g., United States v. LaPorte, C.A. 5 No. 77-2008, August 4, 1977, unpublished; United States v. Haley, 541 F.2d 678 (8 Cir. 1974).