State v. Davey, 216 N.W. 535 (Minn. 1927). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Davey, 216 N.W. 535 (Minn. 1927). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
13 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: MT Properties, Inc. v. CMC Real Estate Corp. (minnctapp, 1992-02-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 3 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) MT Properties, Inc. v. CMC Real Estate Corp.
Minn. Ct. App. · 1992 · confidence medium
Ry., 243 Minn. 566, 570 , 68 N.W.2d 870, 872 (1955); Claesgens v. Animal Rescue League, 173 Minn. 61, 63 , 216 N.W. 535, 536 (1927).
cited Cited "see" In Re the Guardianship & Conservatorship of Doyle
Minn. Ct. App. · 2010 · signal: see · confidence high
See Claesgens v. Animal Rescue League, Inc., 173 Minn. 61, 63 , 216 N.W. 535, 536 (1927).
cited Cited "see" Briggs v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.
Minn. · 1955 · signal: see · confidence high
J., Trial, § 1005; see, Claesgens v. Animal Rescue League, Inc. 173 Minn. 61 , 216 N. W. 535 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State
v.
Lena Davey. [Fn1]
No. 26,361..
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
Dec 2, 1927.
216 N.W. 535
W.D. Scott and H.Z. Mendow , for appellant. Neil M. Cronin , City Attorney, and Palmer B. Rasmussen , Assistant City Attorney, for the state.
PER CURIAM..
Published
Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis of unlawfully having in her possession intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, contrary to an ordinance of said city. The appeal is from the conviction and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

It is assigned as error that the conviction is not justified by the evidence; that the complaint was insufficient; and that the court erred in denying the motion for a new trial.

The evidence has been examined and is found sufficient to sustain the conviction.

The complaint was made in the municipal court in the manner shown in State v. LaDue, 164 Minn. 499, 205 N. W. 450, and State[*94] v. Benson, 171 Minn. 292, 213 N. W. 910, and charges the offense in definite and sufficient terms. It is a good complaint.

There were no errors in rulings on evidence or in denying the motion for a new trial.

Affirmed.