Kittredge v. Bartis, 146 A. 815 (N.H. 1929). · Go Syfert
Kittredge v. Bartis, 146 A. 815 (N.H. 1929). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Walter E. Kittredge & a
v.
Michael Bartis & A.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire.
Jun 27, 1929.
146 A. 815
Walter E. Kittredge, William, H. Barry and Frederic J. Gaffney (Mr. Gaffney orally), pro sese., Alvin A. Lucier and Karl E. Dowd (Mr. Lucier orally), for the defendants.
Per Curiam..
Published
Per Curiam.

The evidence was conflicting as to the claimed estoppel to set up the additional defence. Whether the delay was such as to make it inequitable to permit the defendants to file a belated answer, was for the trial justice to determine. Brown v. Fitzgerald, 70 N. H. 211.

Exception overruled.