Katz v. Essex Sales Co., 138 A. 921 (N.J. 1927). · Go Syfert
Search
Katz v. Essex Sales Co., 138 A. 921 (N.J. 1927). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
William Katz, Appellant,
v.
Essex Sales Company, Respondent
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 17, 1927.
138 A. 921
1927 N.J. LEXIS 311
For the appellant, Aaron Marder. For the respondent, McCarter English.
PER CURIAM..
Published
[*175] Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Trenchard in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — Paricer, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Van Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Heteield, Dear, JJ. 12.

For reversal — Hone.