Rich v. Rich, 156 A. 442 (N.J. 1931). · Go Syfert
Search
Rich v. Rich, 156 A. 442 (N.J. 1931). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Frank v. Frank (njsuperctappdiv, 1950-11-08)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Frank v. Frank
N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. · 1950 · confidence medium
Rich v. Rich, 109 N.J.
Tillie Rich, Complainant-Appellant
v.
Louis Rich, Defendant-Respondent.
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Oct 19, 1931.
156 A. 442
1931 N.J. LEXIS 567
On appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised, by Vice-Chancellor Berry, who filed the following opinion:, Messrs. Lum,, Tamblyn & Golyer, for the appellant., Messrs. Leber & Rubaclc, for the respondent.
PER CURIAM..
Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed by Vice-Chancellor Berry.

For affirmance — The Chief-Jusutice, Trehchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodihe, Daly, Donqes, Vah Buskirk, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.