Cappadonna v. Passaic Motors, Inc., 61 A.2d 282 (N.J. 1948).
Search
Cappadonna v. Passaic Motors, Inc., 61 A.2d 282 (N.J. 1948). Book View Copy Cite
Michael Cappadonna, Defendant-Appellant,
v.
Passaic Motors, Inc., Prosecutor-Respondent
Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Sep 3, 1948.
61 A.2d 282
For the defendant-appellant, Aaron Heller and Dominick De Muro. For the prosecutor-respondent, Kalisch Kalisch ( Isidor Kalisch ).
PER CURIAM..
Cited by 19 opinions  |  Published
Per Curiam.

The questions are chiefly on the facts, and since there is supporting proof we are bound as to them by the Supreme Court decision. Pitchenick v. New York Folding Box Co., 129 N. J. L. 399; Suburban Land Improvement Co. v. Vailsburgh, 68 Id. 311. In so far as the dispute is of law we affirm, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Bodine filed in the Supreme Court.

The judgment below is affirmed.

For affirmance — Tub Chancellor, Chief Justice, Donges, Colie, Eastwood, Burling, Jacobs, Wells, Dill, Freund, McLean, Scttettino, JJ. 12.

For reversal — None.