Pilkington v. Atwell, Gustin, Morris, Inc., 182 N.E. 164 (N.Y. 1932). · Go Syfert
Search
Pilkington v. Atwell, Gustin, Morris, Inc., 182 N.E. 164 (N.Y. 1932). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
William Pilkington, Respondent,
v.
Atwell, Gustin, Morris, Inc., and Terry & Tench Company, Inc., Appellants
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 31, 1932.
Published opinion
182 N.E. 164
1932 N.Y. LEXIS 995
Clarence S. Zipp and E.C. Sherwood for Atwell, Gustin, Morris, Inc., appellant. Leo C. Weiler, Thomas E. Nolan and William E. Lowther for Terry Tench Company, Inc., appellant. Benjamin C. Loder, J. Austin Lyons and Owen E. Reilly for respondent.
Published

Judgment as to defendant Atwell, Gustin, Morris, Inc., affirmed, with costs. Judgment as to Terry & Tench[*524] Company, Inc., reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event, on the ground that it does not appear from the evidence that the act of the superintendent was within the scope of his employment; no opinion.

Concur: Pound, Ch. J., Crane, Lehman, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.