Matter of Chadsey, 95 N.E. 1124 (N.Y. 1911). · Go Syfert
Search
Matter of Chadsey, 95 N.E. 1124 (N.Y. 1911). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: In re Clay (nyappdiv, 1939-03-15)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) In re Clay
N.Y. App. Div. · 1939 · confidence medium
(Matter of Chadsey, 141 App. Div. 458 ; affd., 201 N. Y. 572 ; reargument denied, Id. 600.) The evidence does not indicate a finding that the respondent was guilty of any crime or misdemeanor, but it does indicate that he was guilty of deceit, professional misconduct and of conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice, which make disciplinary measures mandatory.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Nathan B. Chadsey, an Attorney, Appellant. the Association of the Bar of the City of New York, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Mar 14, 1911.
95 N.E. 1124
1911 N.Y. LEXIS 1344
Charles A. Boston and Nathan B. Chadsey for appellant. Einar Chrystie for respondent.
Published

Order affirmed; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.