Pierce v. Armour Co., 171 N.E. 786 (N.Y. 1930). · Go Syfert
Search
Pierce v. Armour Co., 171 N.E. 786 (N.Y. 1930). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
3 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Petra International Banking Corp. v. First American Bank (vaed, 1991-03-01)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Petra International Banking Corp. v. First American Bank
E.D. Va. · 1991 · signal: accord · confidence high
Accord, Bank of New York & Trust Co. v. Atterbury Bros., Inc., 226 A.D. 117 , 234 N.Y.S. 442, 449 (1929) (granting summary judgment for bank where defendant held documents "without protest for two weeks” despite discrepancies and documents were then discovered to be forgeries), aff’d, 253 N.Y. 569 , 171 N.E. 786 (1930); Williams Ice Cream Co. v. Chase National Bank, 210 A.D. 179 , 205 N.Y.S. 446, 449 (N.Y.App.Div.1924) (with respect to alleged alteration of letter of credit, "plaintiff ... waived any such contention by reason of its having taken and used the goods”); see also J & K Plumb…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Hogeboom v. Protts
N.Y. App. Div. · 1968 · signal: compare · confidence low
Jur., Automobiles, § 367; compare Pierce v. Armour & Co., 226 App. Div. 393 , affd. 253 N. Y. 568 ).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harold A. Pierce, Respondent,
v.
Armour & Company, Appellant
New York Court of Appeals.
Apr 8, 1930.
171 N.E. 786
1930 N.Y. LEXIS 936
Patrick J. Tierney for appellant. Kenneth H. Holcombe and Wallace E. Pierce for respondent.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

Judgment affirmed with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Crane, Lehman, O’Brien and Hubbs, JJ. Not sitting: Kellogg, J.