Hammer v. Michael, 155 N.E. 895 (N.Y. 1927). · Go Syfert
Search
Hammer v. Michael, 155 N.E. 895 (N.Y. 1927). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 3 distinct courts.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Samuel Hammer, Respondent,
v.
Harris Michael, Appellant
New York Court of Appeals.
Jan 18, 1927.
155 N.E. 895
1927 N.Y. LEXIS 1086
Published

Motion to amend remittitur. (See 243 N. Y. 445.)

Motion granted, without costs. Return of remittitur requested and when returned the same will be amended by adding a provision that defendant have judgment against plaintiff for the return of his deposit of one thousand dollars, with interest from date of payment thereof.