Love v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., 6 N.E.2d 405 (N.Y. 1936). · Go Syfert
Search
Love v. Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co., 6 N.E.2d 405 (N.Y. 1936). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Mary
v.
Love, as Administratrix of the Estate of Timothy A. Love, Appellant, v. the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company, Respondent
New York Court of Appeals.
Dec 31, 1936.
6 N.E.2d 405
1936 N.Y. LEXIS 1477
John Van Voorhis for appellant. William C. Combs for respondent.
Published

Judgment of the Appellate Division and that of the Trial Term reversed and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. We are of the opinion that the evidence presented a question of fact for the jury. No opinion.

Concur: Crane, Ch. J., Lehman, O’Brien, Hubbs, Crouch, Loughran and Finch, JJ.