James Martin Smith v. Douglas Gonzales, Douglas Gonzales & Ossie B. Brown, 592 F.2d 277 (5th Cir. 1979). · Go Syfert
Search
James Martin Smith v. Douglas Gonzales, Douglas Gonzales & Ossie B. Brown, 592 F.2d 277 (5th Cir. 1979). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: John Doe 1 v. Marriott International, Inc. (mssd, 2022-11-22)
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) John Doe 1 v. Marriott International, Inc.
S.D. Miss. · 2022 · confidence medium
And neither the denial of a motion to remand nor the dismissal of a single party constitutes a final judgment or order. , 585 F.3d 890, 893 (5th Cir. 2009) (denial of motion to remand); , 592 F.2d 277, 277 (5th Cir. 1979) (per curiam) (dismissal of less than all parties).
discussed Cited "see" Raheem v. Department of Revenue CSE
M.D. Fla. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
BARKSDALE United States Magistrate Judge Cc: Counsel of Record Idris Raheem 4950 Richards St., Apt. 35 Jacksonville, FL 32207 F.3d 773 , 779-80 (11th Cir. 2005); see Smith v. Gonzales, 592 F.2d 277, 277 (5th Cir. 1979) (‘This is an appeal from the dismissal of two parties in a multiparty case in which one defendant remains a party.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
James Martin SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Douglas GONZALES Et Al., Defendants, Douglas Gonzales and Ossie B. Brown, Defendants-Appellees
78-2918.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Apr 2, 1979.
592 F.2d 277
1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 15724
Andrew J. Ruzicho, Asst. Atty. Gen., Columbus, Ohio, for plaintiff-appellant., Watson, Blanche, Wilson & Posner, George K. Anding, Jr., Baton Rouge, La., for defendants.
Goldberg, Per Curiam, Roney, Tjoflat.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

This is an appeal from the dismissal of two parties in a multiparty case in which one defendant remains a party. Since there has been neither a final judgment entered nor a determination by the district court that there is no just reason for delay pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), either applied for by the parties or issued by the district court, we lack jurisdiction to entertain this appeal.

The appeal must be dismissed even though the parties do not object to the lack of a certificate. Graham v. Cole, 483 F.2d 255 (5th Cir. 1973); Ronel Corp. v. Anchor Lock of Florida, Inc., 312 F.2d 207 (5th Cir. 1963).

APPEAL DISMISSED.