green
Positive treatment
4.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1979 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1979
2002
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Processed Egg Products Antitrust Litigation
See James Julian, Inc. v. Raytheon Co., 557 F.Supp. 1058, 1065 n. 18 (D.Del.1983) (“While mere membership, even when coupled with knowledge of wrongful conduct of the association, is insufficient to establish knowing participation ..., once attendance is coupled with a consistent later act, an inference of knowing participation is permissible.” (citing Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 465 F.Supp. 195, 231 (S.D.N.Y.1978), aff'd mem., 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir.1979)). *725 Several conventional features of the UEP Certification Program lead the Court to this conclusion.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re China Oil and Gas Pipeline Bureau
See East Europe Domestic Int’l Sales Corp. v. Terra, 467 F.Supp. 383, 387 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd, 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir.1979) (stating FSIA is *56 intended to be long-arm statute and designed to embody requirements of minimum jurisdictional contacts and adequate notice); Linton v. Airbus Industrie, 934 S.W.2d 754, 757 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, writ denied), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1145 , 119 S.Ct. 1039 , 143 L.Ed.2d 47 (1999) (stating challenges to immunity of foreign sovereign are commonly brought under rule 120a governing special appearance).
discussed
Cited "see"
in Re: China Oil and Gas Pipeline Bureau
See East Europe Domestic Int = l Sales Corp. v. Terra , 467 F. Supp. 383, 387 (S.D.N.Y. 1979), aff = d , 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir. 1979) (stating FSIA is intended to be long-arm statute and designed to embody requirements of minimum jurisdictional contacts and adequate notice); Linton v. Airbus Industrie , 934 S.W.2d 754, 757 (Tex. App. C Houston [14th Dist.] 1996, writ denied), cert. denied , 525 U.S. 1145 (1999) (stating challenges to immunity of foreign sovereign are commonly brought under rule 120a governing special appearance).
cited
Cited "see"
Feigles v. Costal Lumber Co.
See INA Aviation Corp. v. United States, 468 F.Supp. 695, 699 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp.
(2×)
See Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 465 F.Supp. 195 (S.D.N.Y.1978), aff’d without opinion, 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir.1979). 17 .
cited
Cited "see"
D.S. Magazines, Inc. v. Warner Publisher Services Inc.
See Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 465 F.Supp. 195 , 199 n. 6 (S.D.N.Y.1978), aff'd mem., 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir.1979) (citing cases). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Exchange National Bank v. Empresa Minera Del Centro Del Peru S.A.
See East Europe Domestic International Sales Corp. v. Terra, 467 F.Supp. 383, 388 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Exchange Nat. Bank of Chicago v. EMPRESA MINERA, ETC.
See East Europe Domestic International Sales Corp. v. Terra, 467 F.Supp. 383, 388 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Gilson v. Republic of Ireland
See generally, East Europe Domestic International Sales Corp. v. Terra, 467 F.Supp. 383 (S.D.N.Y. 1979), aff’d, 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir. 1979).
cited
Cited "see"
Texas Trading & Milling Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria
See East Europe Domestic International Sales Corp. v. Terra, 467 F.Supp. 383, 388 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d mem., 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Apotex Corp. v. Hospira Healthcare India Private Limited
Wholesale Drug Co. v. Shire LLC, 929 F. Supp. 2d 256, 262 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) (“[N]ot every sharp-elbowed business practice — though potentially wrongful as a breach of contract or even fraud — necessarily amounts to an antitrust violation.”’); see also, e.g., Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 465 F. Supp. 195 , 235 n.102 (S.D.N.Y. 1978) (“[T]he antitrust laws are not properly invoked every time a party to a contract claims injury because of another party’s alleged nonperformance of the agreement.”), aff'd, 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir. 1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conte v. US Alliance Federal Credit Union
Bank, 111 F.3d 251, 259-260 (2d Cir.1997); see also INA Aviation Corp. v. United States, 468 F.Supp. 695, 699 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir.1979) (“Negligence questions are properly resolved at trial because, upon a motion for summary judgment, a court may not try issues of fact; it may only determine whether there are factual issues to be tried.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Daniel v. American Board of Emergency Medicine
See, e.g., Hunt v. Mobil Oil Corp., 465 F.Supp. 195, 231 (S.D.N.Y.1978), aff'd, 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir.1979); Van dervelde v. Put & Call Brokers & Dealers Association, 344 F.Supp. 118, 154 (S.D.N.Y.1972).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Percy King and George Russell v. Crossland Savings Bank and American Express Company
See Ortiz v. Rosner, 817 F.Supp. 348, 350 (S.D.N.Y.1993); see also INA Aviation Corp. v. United States, 468 F.Supp. 695, 699 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir.1979) (“[N]egligence questions are properly resolved at trial because, upon a motion for summary judgment, a court may not try issues of fact; it may only determine whether there are factual issues to be tried.”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Transnor (Bermuda) Ltd. v. BP North America Petroleum
Cap Castillo, 490 F.2d 302, 308 (2d Cir.1974); see also INA Aviation Corp. v. United States, 468 F.Supp. 695 (E.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd, 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nellie F. Welsh, Administratrix of the Estate of Francis John Welsh, Deceased, and Nellie Welsh, Individually v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., INA Aviation Corp. v. United States, 468 F.Supp. 695, 700 (E.D.N.Y.), aff'd mem., 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Banco Para El Comercio Exterior De Cuba v. First National City Bank
See, e. g., East Europe Domestic International Sales Corp. v. Terra, 467 F.Supp. 383, 387-88 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d, 610 F.2d 806 (2d Cir. 1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Brissette
v.
MacChiarole
v.
MacChiarole
79-7356.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Oct 15, 1979.
Published
Brissette
v.
Macchiarole
No. 79-7356
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
10/15/79
1
S.D.N.Y.
AFFIRMED