Dula . Young & Clark, Adm'rs., 73 N.C. 69 (N.C. 1875). · Go Syfert
Search
Dula . Young & Clark, Adm'rs., 73 N.C. 69 (N.C. 1875). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sarah H. Dula and Another
v.
. Zephaniah Young and C. W. Clark, Adm'r., C.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Jun 5, 1875.
73 N.C. 69
Reade.
Published
Reade, J.

The learned argument of the counsel for the petitioner failed to satisfy us that we had mistaken any important fact, or misapplied any principle of law or equity. ¥e must therefore adhere to our decision, and for the reasons stated in the opinion of our learned brother, Justice Settle.

There will be judgment against the petitioner for cost.

Pee Cueiam.

Judgment accordingly.