Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Taft Broad. Co., 652 F.2d 603 (6th Cir. 1980). · Go Syfert
Search
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Taft Broad. Co., 652 F.2d 603 (6th Cir. 1980). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner,
v.
TAFT BROADCASTING COMPANY, Respondent
79-1140.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Nov 10, 1980.
652 F.2d 603
1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 12432
Elliott Moore, Kathy Krieger, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Emil C. Farkas, Director, Region 9, N. L. R. B., Cincinnati, Ohio, Paul J. Spielberg, Washington, D. C., for petitioner., Frank H. Stewart, Stephen Boardman, Jeffrey B. Kelly, Taft, Stettinius & Hollis-ter, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent.
Lively, Engel, Peck.
Published

ORDER

This is an appeal for enforcement and a cross-petition to deny enforcement of an NLRB order, reported at 238 N.L.R.B. No. 80 (September 28,1978), directing reinstatement and relief for June Johnson and Hanna Gutmann, discharged employees of the Taft Broadcasting Company in Columbus, Ohio.

Upon a review of the record as a whole, the court concludes that substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision with respect to Johnson, but agrees with the Administrative Law Judge that there is no substantial evidence to support the claim that Gutmann was discharged because of her union activities. On the contrary, it appears that the reasons for Gutmann’s discharge were related solely to her job performance. The Board’s decision that these reasons were pretextual is without support in the record when viewed as a whole. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the order of the Board is enforced as to Johnson, but enforcement as to Gutmann is denied. No costs, neither party having prevailed in full.