Steele v. State, 168 N.E. 846 (Ohio 1929). · Go Syfert
Steele v. State, 168 N.E. 846 (Ohio 1929). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 4 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Carlisle (ohioctapp, 2019-11-12)
Top citers, strongest first. 4 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" State v. Carlisle
Ohio Ct. App. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Bates, 118 Ohio St.3d 174 , 2008-Ohio-1983 , ¶12, quoting State v. O’Mara, 105 Ohio St. 94 (1922), paragraph one of the syllabus.
discussed Cited "see" State v. Moore (Slip Opinion) (2×)
Ohio · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
See O’Mara, 105 Ohio St. 94 , 136 N.E. 885 , at syllabus.
discussed Cited "see" State ex rel. Sensible Norwood v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion) (2×)
Ohio · 2016 · signal: see · confidence high
Bd. of Elections, 80 Ohio St.3d 165, 168 , 685 N.E.2d 224 (1997); see Ohio Constitution, Article II, Section If. {¶ 10} R.C. 715.67 specifies that a “municipal corporation may make the violation of any of its ordinances a misdemeanor, and provide for the'punishment thereof by fine or imprisonment, or both.” However, “[t]he power to define and classify and prescribe punishment for felonies committed within the state is lodged in the General Assembly.” State v. O’Mara, 105 Ohio St. 94 , 136 N.E. 885 (1922), paragraph one of the syllabus, overruled in part on other grounds, Steele v. S…
cited Cited "see" City of Cincinnati v. Hoffman
Ohio · 1972 · signal: see · confidence high
See paragraph one of the syllabus in State v. O’Mara (1922), 105 Ohio St. 94 , approved in Steele v. State, 121 Ohio St. 332 ; Local Government Law — Municipal Power to Define Crimes, 13 Ohio St.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Steele
v.
the State of Ohio
21660.
Ohio Supreme Court.
Nov 13, 1929.
168 N.E. 846
1929 Ohio LEXIS 259
Mr. George D. Lewis , for plaintiff in error. Mr. G.H. Birrell , prosecuting attorney, and Mr. George W. Secrest , for defendant in error.
Kinkade, Robinson, Jones, Matthias.
Cited by 7 opinions  |  Published
By the Court.

The plaintiff in error, Thomas Steele, was indicted for manslaughter, committed in the city of Warren, Trumbull county, Ohio. On the trial the state offered in evidence an ordinance duly adopted by the city of Warren, making it unlawful for four or more persons to be in the front seat of an automobile when driven upon the streets of the city. The homicide resulted from a collision while Steele was driving one of the two colliding automo[*333] biles in the city of Warren, and when he had in the front seat with him at the time three other persons. The ordinance was offered to establish the fact that at the time of the homicide Steele was engaged in committing an unlawful act. Introduction of the ordinance was objected to by Steele, the objection overruled, and exceptions saved. Steele was found guilty, and sentenced to a minimum term of 15 years in the penitentiary. This judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. Steele prosecutes error to this court.

The judgments of the lower courts must be reversed, on the authority of Johnson v. State, 66 Ohio St., 59, 63 N. E., 607, 61 L. R. A., 277, 90 Am. St. Rep., 564; State v. Collingsworth, 82 Ohio St., 154, 92 N. E., 22, 28 Am. St. Rep., 770, 137 Am. St. Rep., 775; and the first and second paragraphs of the syllabus in the case of State v. O’Mara, 105 Ohio St., 94, 136 N. E., 885. The statement of the law in paragraphs 3 and 4 of that case is disapproved and overruled.

Judgments reversed.

Kinkade, Robinson, Jones and Matthias, JJ., concur.