New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City, 7 P.2d 638 (Okla. 1931). · Go Syfert
Search
New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. First Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City, 7 P.2d 638 (Okla. 1931). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
G Cite
cited 3× by 2 distinct cases, 1985–2014 · 2 courts · …where the slander complained of consists of a continued claim of rights in plaintiffs property by defendant, the statute of limitations does not commence to run until defendant ceases to set up his adverse claims. ⚠ not in text
60 citation events (4 in the last 25 years) across 10 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Yerion v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. (vaed, 2014-03-05)
Treatment trajectory · 1933 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1933 1979 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Yerion v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. (2×)
E.D. Va. · 2014 · quote attribution · 2 verbatim quotes · confidence low
where the slander complained of consists of a continued claim of rights in plaintiffs property by defendant, the statute of limitations does not commence to run until defendant ceases to set up his adverse claims.
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Marshall v. American Federation of Government Employees
W.D. Okla. · 1998 · confidence medium
See Appellant’s Br. at 14 (citing Young v. Young, 709 P.2d 1254, 1259 (Wyo.1985); Polin v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 511 F.2d 875, 878 (10th Cir.1975); New England Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. Rogers, 7 P.2d 638, 642 (Okla.1931)). 13 .
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Chickasaw Telephone v. Southwestern Bell (2×)
10th Cir. · 1997 · confidence medium
See Tiberi, 89 F.3d at 1431 (stating continuing wrong doctrine cannot be applied where the plaintiff’s injury is definite and discoverable, and nothing prevented the See Appellant’s Br. at 14 (citing Young v. Young, 709 P.2d 1254, 1259 (Wyo. 12 1985); Polin v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc., 511 F.2d 875, 878 (10th Cir. 1975); New England Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. Rogers, 7 P.2d 638, 642 (Okla. 1931)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Chickasaw Telephone Co. v. Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems, Inc.
10th Cir. · 1997 · confidence medium
Gas Co., 507 P.2d 1236, 1242 (Okla.1972) (holding action not barred by statute of limitations where defendant made continuing violations of its continuing duty to disclose facts relevant to Federal Power Commission's decision to grant defendant's application to abandon gas service) 9 These injuries may include Southwestern Bell's failure to distribute profits from the RSAs to the limited partnership, as Chickasaw urges is required by section 6.3 of the partnership agreement 10 The district court relied almost exclusively on United States Cellular in its order 11 The partnership agreement in Un…
discussed Cited "see" Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Curtis (2×)
E.D. Okla. · 1949 · signal: see · confidence high
See New England Oil & Pipe Line Co. v. Rogers, 154 Okl. 285 , 7 P.2d 638 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY CO.
v.
FIRST NAT. BANK OF OKLAHOMA CITY Et Al.
19797.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Dec 1, 1931.
7 P.2d 638
1931 Okla. LEXIS 506
Nowlin, Spielman & Thomas, for plaintiff in error., Dolman & Dyer, for defendant in error.
McNeill, Lester, Clark, Cullison, Swindall, Andrews, Kornegay, Riley, Pugh.
Cited by 24 opinions  |  Published
1 passages pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 67%
Citer courts: E.D. Virginia (2)
McNEILL, J.

This is a companion case to No. 19796, entitled “New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. First National Bank, Oklahoma City et al.,” this day decided by this court. (154 Okla. 74, 6 P. (2d) 779.) The parties are the same, except that in case No. 19796 the Exchange National Bank of Ardmore was codefendant with the First National Bank of Oklahoma City, Okla. In the case at bar, the American. National Bank of Ardmore is a eodefendant with the First National Bank of Oklahoma City. The pleadings, evidence, agreed stipulation of facts and briefs are substantially the same as in case No. 19796. In the case at bar the check involved is in the sum of $6,461.05, being one of the two cashier’s checks of the First National Bank of Oklahoma City mentioned in said cause No. 19796 payable to “S. F. Haynie, County Treasurer.” The same was indorsed by “S. F. Haynie, County Treas. urer, Carter County, Okla., and presented to said American National Bank of Ardmore instead of to said Exchange National Bank. The American National Bank paid the proceeds thereof to said S. F. Haynie individually, upon his request, and the same was misappropriated by said Haynie to the detriment of Carter county.

In view of the opinion in case No. 19796, we hold that the principles of law therein announced are controlling herein, and that the judgment of the trial court should be, and the same is hereby affirmed.

LESTER, C. J., CLARK, V. C. J., and CULLISON, SWINDALL, ANDREWS, and KORNEGAY, JJ., concur. RILEY, J., dissents. PUGH, Special Justice, absent.