green
Positive treatment
3.9 score
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
King Estate
(3×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Such a method of appor *635 tionment is prescribed in all of our adjudicated cases; for example: Earp’s Appeal, 28 Pa. 368 ; Flaccus’s Estate, 283 Pa. 185 , 129 A. 74 ; Mallory’s Estate, 285 Pa. 186 , 131 A. 714 ; Dickinson’s Estate, 285 Pa. 449 , 132 A. 352 ; Flinn’s Estate, 320 Pa. 15, 25 , 181 A. 492, 496, 497 ; Daily’s Estate, 323 Pa. 42, 48 , 186 A. 754, 757 ; Barnes’ Estate, 338 Pa. 555 , 12 A. 2d 912 .
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Lueders' Estate
The answer to this attempt is to be found in an overwhelming array of cases establishing the rule to be that, where extraordinary dividends are declared and paid on shares of stock left by a decedent in trust, they must be distributed by adding to the corpus a sufficient portion to keep intact the value of the shares as they existed at the time the trust was created, and allotting the balance to those entitled to the income of the trust estate: Boyer's Appeal, 224 Pa. 144, 150, 151, 152 ; Stokes’ Estate (No. 1), 240 Pa. 277, 284-286 ; Stokes’ Estate (No. 2), 240 Pa. 288, 291 ; McKeown’s …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Flinn's Estate.
Oct 15, 1935.
John O. Wicks , of Weller, Wicks Wallace , for appellants.
Charles Alvin Jones , for appellee.
Cubiam, Frazer, Kephart, Schaffer, Maxey, Drew, Linn, Barnes.
Pee Cubiam,
After a careful study of tbe record in this proceeding, we are of the opinion that, under the situation shown, the apportionment of the stock dividend as made by the, court below is proper. We see no reason to disturb the fee of the guardian and trustee ad litem as fixed by the court below.
Decree affirmed at appellants’ cost.