Cumberland Cnty. v. Lemoyne Trust Co., 178 A. 32 (1935). · Go Syfert
Search
Cumberland Cnty. v. Lemoyne Trust Co., 178 A. 32 (1935). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
33 citation events across 6 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Gross Est., 26 Pa. D. & C.2d 735 (1962)
Treatment trajectory · 1937 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1937 1981 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
318 Pa. at 95 cited at this page2 citing cases
  • Gross Est., 26 Pa. D. & C.2d 735 (1962).published
    To hold that Mrs. Gross was in any way the creator of the trust before us would do violence to the basic theory of trust law long established in this Commonwealth: Converse v. Hawse, 326 Pa. 1, 4 (1937) : Cumberland County v. Lemoyne Trust…
  • Nace v. Fulton Cnty. Nat'l Bank, 79 Pa. D. & C. 325 (1951).published
    In Cumberland County v. Lemoyne Trust Company, 318 Pa. 85, 95 (1935), it was held: “Any agreement or contract in writing made by a person having the power of disposal over property, whereby such person agrees or directs that particular pro…
318 Pa. at 98 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Commonwealth v. W. Maryland Ry. Co., 105 A.2d 336 (Pa. 1954).published
    As a sovereign state we cannot be thus estopped, . . .” In Cumberland County v. Lemoyne Trust Compwny, 318 Pa. 85, 98, 99 , 178 A. 32, 38 , it was stated that “ ‘No estoppel in pais can be asserted against the exercise by the State of its…
318 Pa. at 97 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Girard Trust Co. v. Philadelphia, 87 A.2d 277 (Pa. 1952).published 2 cites
    This mortgage (if it be material) is much more like a mortgage against which participation certificates are issued and which was held to be subject to the tax in Cumberland County v. Lemoyne Trust Co., 318 Pa. 85, 97, 98 , 178 A. 32 .
Other citing cases3 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Cumberland County
v.
Lemoyne Trust Company, Appellant
Jan 7, 1935.
Published opinion
178 A. 32
1935 Pa. LEXIS 521
E. M. Biddle, Jr. , with him John E. Myers , for appellant. L. Floyd Hess , with him Caleb S. Brinton , County Solicitor, for appellee. John Y. Scott , Deputy Attorney General, with him Charles J. Margiotti , Attorney General, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
Frazer, Simpson, Schaefer, Maxey, Drew, Linn.
Per Curiam,

A thorough examination of the record in this case convinces us that all questions raised for our consideration have been fully considered and correctly disposed of in the opinion of President Judge Reese. Nothing further need be added to what the learned trial judge has so well said.

Judgment affirmed at appellant’s costs.