Harrison v. Crosby, 88 S.E. 1102 (S.C. 1916). · Go Syfert
Search
Harrison v. Crosby, 88 S.E. 1102 (S.C. 1916). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Treatment trajectory · 1924 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1924 1975 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harrison
v.
Crosby.
9379.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Apr 13, 1916.
Published opinion
88 S.E. 1102
1916 S.C. LEXIS 128
Mr. B.B. Clarke , for appellant, cites: As to presumption in favor of holder as indorsee for value, etc.: 87 S.C. 78 ; 28 S.C. 143 ; 32 S.C. 538 . Charge: 64 S.C. 509 ; 77 S.C. 39 . Mr. W.B. de Loach , for respondent, cites: As to circumstantial evidence of holder's bad faith: 91 S.C. 461 .
Hydrick, Messrs, Watts, Gage, Gary, Fraser.
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Hydrick.

This case is controlled by the decision in Bank v. Stackhouse, 91 S. C. 455, 74 S. E. 977, 40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 454, which has been reaffirmed in numerous cases, some of' which are cited in Givens v. Bank, 103 S. C. 174, 86 S. E. 24. See, also, Cannon v. Clarendon Hardware Co., 103 S. C. 538, 88 S. E. 284. The verdict should have been directed for plaintiff.

Judgment reversed.

Messrs. Justices Watts and Gage concur in the opinion announced. Mr. Chief Justice Gary and Mr. Justice Fraser did not sit in this case, and did not participate in the decision.