Spearman v. F. S. Royster Guano Co., 199 S.E. 530 (S.C. 1938). · Go Syfert
Search
Spearman v. F. S. Royster Guano Co., 199 S.E. 530 (S.C. 1938). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (2 in the last 25 years) across 3 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Dodd v. Exide Battery (scctapp, 2005-01-13)
Treatment trajectory · 1939 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1939 1982 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Dodd v. Exide Battery
S.C. Ct. App. · 2005 · confidence medium
Royster Guano Co. , 188 S.C. 393, 403-04 , 199 S.E. 530, 535 (1938) (stating the commission possesses broad authority to take additional testimony); see also 25A S.C.
cited Cited "see" Hartzell v. State Board of Examiners in Psychology
S.C. · 1980 · signal: see · confidence high
See Spearman v. F. S. Royster Guano Co., 188 S. C. 393, 199 S. E. 530 (1938).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Spearman
v.
F. S. Royster Guano Co. Et Al.
Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Oct 31, 1938.
199 S.E. 530
1938 S.C. LEXIS 173
Messrs. Foster Dunbar , for appellant, cite: Accidental injury arising out of employment: 153 S.E., 266 ; 158 P., 256; Ann. Cas., 1918-B, 354; 152 S.E., 805 ; L.R.A., 1916-A, 227; 144 N.E., 857 ; 96 So., 188 ; L.R.A., 1916-A. 22; Ann. Cas., 1916-A, 386; 148 N.W., 243; 6 A.L.R., 1242; 116 N.E., 1060; 13 A.L.R., 522; 181 N.W., 706; 174 S.E., 509 ; 162 S.E., 223; 128 A., 635 ; 44 A.L.R., 363; 164 S.E., 492. Evidence: 2 Brev., 461; 196 S.E., 342 ; 195 S.E., 34; 194 S.E., 303 ; 164 S.E., 344; 174 S.E., 911 ; 3 L.Ed., 348 ; 113 S.C. 84 ; 100 S.E., 892 ; 113 S.C. 326 ; 101 S.E., 849 ; 52 S.C. 428 ; 29 S.E., 856 ; 30 S.E., 142; 59 S.C. 311 ; 37 S.E., 938 ; 91 S.C. 523 ; 74 S.E., 386 ; Ann. Cas., 1914-A, 139; 192 S.E., 266; 162 S.C. 17 ; 159 S.E., 818 ; 161 S.C. 479 ; 159 S.E., 822 ; 69 S.C. 413 ; 48 S.E., 290 ; 66 L.R.A., 723; 104 A.S. R., 811; 162 S.E., 247. Hypothetical questions: 197 S.E., 398 ; 22 C.J., 706; 179 A., 54 ; 98 A.L.R., 1006. Total disability: 166 S.C. 316 ; 164 S.E., 878 ; 166 S.C. 367 ; 164 S.E., 881 . Messrs. Osborne, Butler Moore , for respondent, cite: Evidence: 185 S.C. 497 : 194 S.E., 447 ; 186 S.C. 374 ; 195 S.E., 646 . As to new trial on newly discovered evidence: 184 S.C. 158 ; 191 S.E., 905 .
Chiee, Stabler, Messrs, Bonham, Baker, Fishburne, Carter.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. ChiEE Justice; Stabler.

[*408] The appeal in this case is from an order of the Circuit Court affirming an award of the South Carolina Industrial Commission. In his well-prepared decree, as will be seen, Judge Sease, by whom the matter was heard, gave much thought and full consideration to the several questions involved in the controversy; and this Court is entirely satisfied, from a careful examination of the record, with the conclusions reached by him.

The Circuit decree, which will be reported, is affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Bonham, Baker and Fishburne concur. Mr. Justice Carter did not participate on account of illness.