Gilliam v. State, 177 S.W.2d 782 (Tex. Crim. App. 1944). · Go Syfert
Search
Gilliam v. State, 177 S.W.2d 782 (Tex. Crim. App. 1944). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
10 citation events across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Conners v. State, 966 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 783 cited at this page1 citing case
  • Conners v. State, 966 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1998).published
    See, e.g., McDonald v. State, 118 Tex.Crim. 10 , 37 S.W.2d 1018, 1018 (1931); Newell v. State, 131 Tex.Crim. 603 , 101 S.W.2d 254, 255 (1937); Gilliam v. State, 146 Tex.Crim. 620 , 177 S.W.2d 782, 783 (1944); Kuykendall v. State, 154 Tex.C…
Other citing cases1 with no pin cite or quoted language on record
  • Page v. State, 532 S.W.2d 341 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976).published 2 cites
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bill Gilliam
v.
the State
No. 22754..
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.
Feb 9, 1944.
Published opinion
177 S.W.2d 782
1944 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 826
Letcher D. King, of Abilene, for appellant. Ernest S. Goens, State's Attorney, of Austin, for the State.
Hawkins.
Cited by 6 opinions  |  Published
HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for possessing for the purpose of sale whisky in a dry area, the punishment assessed being a fine of $100.00.

There appears in the record a request that the appeal be dismissed, but same is signed only by appellant’s attorney. A request for dismissal must be executed by the appellant in person and properly authenticated. See 4 Tex. Jur., p. 497, sec. 347; Jennings v. State, 68 Tex. Cr. R. 613, 151 S. W. 1050; Catron v. State, 63 Tex. Cr. R. 377, 140 S. W. 226.

The State’s pleadings are in proper form to charge the offense, and there is no statement of facts nor bills of exception in the record. In this condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.