United States v. Janet Woodley, 732 F.2d 111 (9th Cir. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
United States v. Janet Woodley, 732 F.2d 111 (9th Cir. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Joseph Torrey v. Wayne Estelle (ca9, 1988-03-23)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Joseph Torrey v. Wayne Estelle (2×)
9th Cir. · 1988 · confidence medium
In contrast, collateral consequences include the possibility that sentences may run consecutively, United States v. Rubalcaba, 811 F.2d 491, 494 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 108 S.Ct. 107 , 98 L.Ed.2d 66 (1987); the possibility of revocation of parole, Sanchez, 572 F.2d at 211 ; potential deportation, Fruchtman v. Kenton, 531 F.2d 946, 949 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 895 , 97 S.Ct. 256 , 50 L.Ed.2d 158 (1976); civil tax liability, King, 618 F.2d at 553 ; the likelihood of an undesirable military discharge, Redwine v. Zuckert, 317 F.2d 336 (D.C.Cir.1963); and the potential for…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Janet WOODLEY, Defendant-Appellant
82-1028.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Apr 26, 1984.
732 F.2d 111
1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 23130
Elliot Enoki, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiff-appellee., Pamela J. Berman, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendant-appellant.
Browning, Choy, Goodwin, Wallace, Sneed, Kennedy, Anderson, Hug, Tang, Skopil, Schroeder, Fletcher, Farris, Pregerson, Alarcon, Poole, Ferguson, Nelson, Canby, Boochever, Norris, Reinhardt.
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by an en banc panel of the court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn, 726 F.2d 1328 (9th Cir.1983).