In Re Peter N. Njang, 154 A.3d 1182 (D.C. 2017). · Go Syfert
Search
In Re Peter N. Njang, 154 A.3d 1182 (D.C. 2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In RE Peter N. NJANG, Respondent
16-BG-1246.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
Mar 2, 2017.
154 A.3d 1182
Glickman, Per Curiam, Pryor, Reid.
Published

ORDER

PER CURIAM

On consideration of the Board on Professional Responsibility’s Report and Recommendation, and this court’s December 27, 2016, order directing respondent to show cause why he should not be suspended pending final action on the Board’s report, and no response having been filed, it is

ORDERED that Peter N. Njang is hereby suspended from the practice of law in the District of Columbia pending final disposition of this proceeding. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that respondent’s attention is directed to the requirements of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14 relating to suspended attorneys and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 16 (c), dealing with the timing of eligibility for reinstatement as related to compliance with R. XI, § 14, including filing of the required affidavit.