Robert N. Gresham v. State of Florida, 220 So. 3d 1133 (Fla. 2017). · Go Syfert
Search
Robert N. Gresham v. State of Florida, 220 So. 3d 1133 (Fla. 2017). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
17 citation events (17 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Raymond Bright v. State of Florida & Raymond Bright v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (fla, 2026-02-26)
Top citers, strongest first. 11 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Raymond Bright v. State of Florida & Raymond Bright v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
Fla. · 2026 · confidence medium
“To be entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a claim of ineffective assistance, the defendant must allege specific facts that are not conclusively rebutted by the record . . . .” Anderson v. State, 220 So. 3d 1133, 1142 (Fla. 2017) (quoting Rhodes v. State, 986 So. 2d 501, 513-14 (Fla. 2008)).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Loran Cole v. State of Florida
Fla. · 2024 · confidence medium
Anderson v. State, 220 So. 3d 1133, 1142 (Fla. 2017); see also LeCroy v. Dugger, 727 So. 2d 236, 238 (Fla. 1998).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) David James Martin v. State of Florida
Fla. · 2021 · confidence medium
“To be entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a claim of ineffective assistance, the defendant must allege specific facts that are not conclusively rebutted by the record and which demonstrate a deficiency in performance that prejudiced the defendant.” Anderson v. State, 220 So. 3d 1133, 1142 (Fla. 2017) (quoting Rhodes v. State, 986 So. 2d 501, 513-14 (Fla. 2008)).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Jose Antonio Jimenez v. State of Florida & SC18-1321 Jose Antonio Jimenez v. State of Florida
Fla. · 2018 · confidence medium
Anderson v. State, 220 So. 3d 1133, 1142 (Fla. 2017); see also LeCroy v. Dugger, 727 So. 2d 236, 238 (Fla. 1998) (“[S]peculation and conjecture about what . . . letters and notes and opinions and cryptic references may suggest is not sufficient to warrant an evidentiary hearing, much less relief.”) (quoting trial court’s order). - 28 - As explained below, application of these standards to Jimenez’s subclaims makes clear that Jimenez is not entitled to relief on these claims. (1) Virginia Taranco, the neighbor In his first subclaim, Jimenez argues that the State committed a Brady violat…
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Watts v. State
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2018 · confidence medium
Rather, a trial court’s “decision of whether to grant an evidentiary hearing on a [post-conviction] motion is ultimately based on the written materials before the court, and the ruling of the postconviction trial court 2 on that issue is tantamount to a pure question of law subject to de novo review.” Anderson v. State, 220 So. 3d 1133, 1142 (Fla. 2017) (quoting Troy v. State, 57 So. 3d 828, 834 (Fla. 2011) (emphasis added).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Richard Eugene Hamilton v. State of Florida
Fla. · 2018 · confidence medium
Anderson v. State, 220 So. 3d 1133, 1150 (Fla. 2017).
discussed Cited "see" Jose Luis Ochoa Ramos v. State of Florida
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2025 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anderson v. State, 220 So. 3d 1133, 1146 (Fla. 2017) (holding that often a “cross-examination will be sufficient to expose defects in an expert’s presentation” and Strickland does not require “an equal and opposite expert from the defense” for every state expert).
discussed Cited "see" Margaret A. Allen v. State of Florida (2×)
Fla. · 2019 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anderson v. State , 220 So.3d 1133 , 1146 (Fla. 2017).
cited Cited "see" Margaret A. Allen v. State of Florida
Fla. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anderson v. State, 220 So. 3d 1133, 1146 (Fla. 2017).
cited Cited "see" Margaret A. Allen v. State of Florida
Fla. · 2018 · signal: see · confidence high
See Anderson v. State, 220 So. 3d 1133, 1146 (Fla. 2017).
cited Cited "see, e.g." State of Florida Department of Corr. v. Andrew Junod
Fla. Dist. Ct. App. · 2017 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Anderson v. State, 220 So.3d 1133 , 2017 WL 930924 (No. SC12-1252, 14-881) (Fla. Mar. 9, 2017) (describing Daubert as "more lenient” than Frye).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Robert N. GRESHAM, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent
SC16-359.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Jun 1, 2017.
220 So. 3d 1133
2017 WL 2376417
2017 Fla. LEXIS 1212
Thomas A. Burns of Burns, P.A., Tampa, Florida, for Petitioner, Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, for Respondent
Labarga, Pariente, Lewis, Quince, Polston, Lawson, Canady.
Published
PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Gresham v. State, 181 So.3d 1207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we conclude that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction.

It is so ordered.

LABARGA, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur. CANADY, J., concurs in result.