Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Miller
Inasmuch as defendant's valid waiver of the right to appeal specifically included a waiver of the right to challenge the severity of the sentence and defendant was informed of "the maximum sentence [County Court] could impose in its discretion," the waiver encompasses his challenge to the severity of his sentence ( People v Lococo , 92 NY2d 825, 827 [1998]; see People v Lasher , 151 AD3d 1774 , 1775 [4th Dept 2017], lv denied 29 NY3d 1129 [2017]).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In the Matter of Frans Sital, Petitioner,
v.
Anthony Annucci, Acting Commissioner, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent
v.
Anthony Annucci, Acting Commissioner, New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, Respondent
749 TP 16-02187.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jun 9, 2017.
Smith, Centra, Peradotto, Lindley, Nemoyer.
Published
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Michael M. Mohun, A.J.], entered November 30, 2016) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.
It is hereby ordered that the determination is unanimously confirmed without costs and the petition is dismissed.
Present — Smith, J.P., Centra, Peradotto, Lindley and NeMoyer, JJ.