Jenkins v. Schweiker, 742 F.2d 1437 (2d Cir. 1983). · Go Syfert
Search
Jenkins v. Schweiker, 742 F.2d 1437 (2d Cir. 1983). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
78 citation events (10 in the last 25 years) across 17 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Secalt S.A. v. Wuxi Shenxi Construction MacHinery Co. (ca9, 2012-02-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983 2004 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited "see" Secalt S.A. v. Wuxi Shenxi Construction MacHinery Co.
9th Cir. · 2012 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mennen Co. v. Gillette Co., 565 F.Supp. 648, 657 (S.D.N.Y.1983), aff'd, 742 F.2d 1437 (2d Cir.1984) (attorney’s fees justified where suit was filed “as a competitive ploy”).
cited Cited "see" Vital Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. American Body Building Products, LLC
S.D. Fla. · 2007 · signal: see · confidence high
See Mennen Co. v. Gillette Co., 565 F.Supp. 648 (S.D.N.Y.1983), aff'd mem., 742 F.2d 1437 (2d Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see" Cunniff v. Westfield, Inc.
E.D.N.Y · 1993 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lowenstein Dyes & Cosmetics v. Aetna Life and Casualty Co., 524 F.Supp. 574, 579 (E.D.N.Y. 1981), aff'd, 742 F.2d 1437 (2d Cir.1983). 1 *58 Finally, as to Maryland’s contention that it should be permitted to participate in the selection of Westfield’s counsel, the argument advanced is unavailing.
cited Cited "see" Union Carbide Corp. v. Fred Meyer, Inc.
D. Or. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See, Mennen Co. v. Gillette Co., 565 F.Supp. 648, 653 (S.D.N.Y.1983), aff'd, 742 F.2d 1437 (2d Cir.1984); In re Bell Electric Co., 192 U.S.P.Q. 395 , 399 (T.T.A.B.1976); 1 J.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Home Show Tours, Inc. v. Quad City Virtual, Inc.
S.D. Iowa · 2012 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
The Court further finds that, at a minimum, by the time QCFSBO filed its motion for summary judgment, Home Show’s behavior “went beyond the pale of acceptable conduct.” Aromatique, Inc., 28 F.3d at 877 ; see, e.g., Mennen Co. v. Gillette Co., 565 F.Supp. 648, 657 (S.D.N.Y.1983), aff'd, 742 F.2d 1437 (2d Cir.1984) (awarding defendant Lanham Act attorney fees reasoning that “[tjhere is a substantial overtone in this case to warrant an inference that this suit was initiated as a competitive ploy,” and thus “it carries necessary damage to the defendant when the plaintiffs claims are fo…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." New Sensor Corp. v. CE DISTRIBUTION LLC
E.D.N.Y · 2005 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Mennen Co. v. Gillette Co., 565 F.Supp. 648, 657 (S.D.N.Y.1983) (awarding attorney fees under § 35(a) where there was “a substantial overtone in this case to warrant an inference that this suit was initiated as a cona-petitive ploy”), aff'd, 742 F.2d 1437 (2d Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Sports Authority, Inc. v. Abercrombie & Fitch, Inc.
E.D. Mich. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., The Mennen Co. v. The Gillette Co., 565 F.Supp. 648, 652-53 (S.D.N.Y.1983), aff'd, 742 F.2d 1437 (2d Cir.1984) (excluding survey evidence based on, inter alia, “the prompting and suggestive nature of the question” at a bench trial).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Gap, Inc. v. Stone International Trading, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1997 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Mennen Co. v. Gillette Co., 565 F.Supp. 648 (S.D.N.Y.1983), aff'd, 742 F.2d 1437 (2d Cir. 1984) (awarding counsel fees to a defen dant which had successfully defended against trademark and unfair competition claims).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jenkins
v.
Schweiker
82-6273.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
Jun 3, 1983.
742 F.2d 1437
Published

742 F.2d 1437

Jenkins
v.
Schweiker

82-6273

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

6/3/83

1

S.D.N.Y.

REVERSED AND REMANDED