No syfertize treatment data for this case.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Gerald D. FULLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Warden Frank B. BISHOP, Jr.; F.S.C. II Larry D. Hanlin; Supervisor; Keefe Commissary Network Sales, Defendants-Appellees
v.
Warden Frank B. BISHOP, Jr.; F.S.C. II Larry D. Hanlin; Supervisor; Keefe Commissary Network Sales, Defendants-Appellees
17-6423.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Sep 22, 2017.
Unpublished opinion
697 F. App'x 233
Gerald D. Fuller, Appellant Pro Se. An-kush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Wilkinson, Agee, Hamilton.
Unpublished
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:Gerald Davis Fuller appeals the district court’s orders granting summary judgment to defendants in his action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Fuller v. Bishop, No. 1:15-cv-02524-WMN, 2017 WL 386536 (D. Md. Jan. 27 & Mar. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED