Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Matter of Reese v. Erie County Bd. of Elections
Even assuming, arguendo, that "the Board's meeting to review objections to petitioner's designating petition, which did not involve deliberation on a matter of public policy, could be deemed subject to the Open Meetings Law" ( Matter of Krauss v Suffolk County Bd. of Elections , 153 AD3d 1211, 1213 [2d Dept 2017]; see generally Matter of Perez v City Univ. of N.Y. , 5 NY3d 522, 528 [2005]), we note that " [n]ot every breach of the "Open Meetings Law" automatically triggers its enforcement sanctions' " ( Matter of Max v Ward , 107 AD3d 1597 , 1600 [4th Dept 2013], quoting Matter of New York Uni…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Brian Abner, Appellant
v.
Brian Abner, Appellant
4538 5825/14.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Sep 28, 2017.
Tom, Maz-Zarelli, Andrias, Oing, Singh.
Published
An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Laura A. Ward, J.), rendered January 25, 2016, said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive, it is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.
Concur — Tom, J.P., Maz-zarelli, Andrias, Oing and Singh, JJ.