green
Positive treatment
1.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 2 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Ainslie v. United States
See Lambert v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 303, 305 , aff'd, 746 F.2d 1490 (Fed.Cir.1984) (DEA employees could not receive back pay for delayed appointments because they did not perform a federal function during the delay period); Holmes v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 521, 523-24 (1983) (P. Miller, J.) (Back Pay Act provides no applicant denied appointment in violation of regulation); see also Wrenn v. Secretary, Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 918 F.2d 1073, 1077 (2d Cir.1990); Smith v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 168 , 654 F.2d 50, 52 (1981).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Solar Turbines, Inc. v. United States
See also, L’Enfant Plaza Properties, Inc. v. United States, 3 Cl.Ct. 582, 589 (1983), aff'd and remanded without opinion, 746 F.2d 1490 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Campbell (Wyatte F.)
v.
Merit Systems Protection Boardcampbell v. Merit Sy
v.
Merit Systems Protection Boardcampbell v. Merit Sy
84-984.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Sep 14, 1984.
746 F.2d 1490
Published
Campbell (Wyatte F.)
v.
Merit Systems Protection BoardCampbell v. Merit Sy
NO. 84-984
United States Court of Appeals,
federal Circuit.
SEP 14, 1984
Appeal From: SPB
MSPB.