Deshane v. Deere & Co., 747 F.2d 1194 (8th Cir. 1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Deshane v. Deere & Co., 747 F.2d 1194 (8th Cir. 1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
2 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Strongest positive: Sun World Lines, Ltd. And Double Cee Investments, Ltd. v. March Shipping Corporation and March Shipping Passenger Services, Peter Deilmann (ca8, 1986-09-25)
Top citers, strongest first. 1 distinct citer. How cited ↗
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Sun World Lines, Ltd. And Double Cee Investments, Ltd. v. March Shipping Corporation and March Shipping Passenger Services, Peter Deilmann
8th Cir. · 1986 · confidence medium
Cf. The Bremen, 407 U.S. at 7 , 92 S.Ct. at 1911 (abuse of discretion standard applicable to forum non conveniens determination); DeShane v. John Deere & Co., 747 F.2d 1194, 1195 (8th Cir.1984) (same).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
David Deshane, Individually, and David Deshane, as Father and Next Friend of David D. Deshane, Katherine D. Deshane, and Debra Ann Deshane, and Dorothy Deshane
v.
Deere & Company
83-1561.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Nov 2, 1984.
747 F.2d 1194
1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17083
Published

747 F.2d 1194

David DeSHANE, Individually, and David DeShane, as Father
and Next Friend of David D. DeShane, Katherine D.
DeShane, and Debra Ann DeShane, and
Dorothy DeShane, Appellants,
v.
DEERE & COMPANY, Appellee.

No. 83-1561.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Nov. 2, 1984.

Before ROSS, McMILLIAN and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

[*~1194–1195]1

The facts involved in this appeal are set forth in our prior opinion, DeShane v. Deere & Co., 726 F.2d 443 (8th Cir.1984). The district court[1] had dismissed appellants' product liability action on the ground of forum non conveniens. We vacated the order of the district court and remanded this case to the district court with directions to make further findings of fact and set forth the reasons supporting its decision to dismiss.

2

We have carefully reviewed the district court's order on remand[2] and the parties' supplemental briefs. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm the order of the district court dismissing the action on the ground of forum non conveniens.

3

Accordingly, the order of the district court is affirmed. 8th Cir.R. 14.

1

The Honorable William C. Stuart, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa

2

DeShane v. Deere & Co., No. 82-514-C (S.D.Iowa Sept. 4, 1984) (order on remand)