Stutte v. State, 2013 Ark. App. 514. · Go Syfert
Stutte v. State, 2013 Ark. App. 514. Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
5 citation events (5 in the last 25 years) across 1 distinct court.
Cited for

No citing cases on record.

Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Stutte
v.
State
CR-12-1027.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas.
Sep 18, 2013.
Published opinion
2013 Ark. App. 514
Kenneth S. Hixson.
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Susan Williams

Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 514 2019.01. 02 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS 15:37:29

DIVISION IV -06'00' No. CR-12-1027

Opinion Delivered SEPTEMBER 18, 2013

CHARLES L. STUTTE APPEAL FROM THE WASHINGTON

APPELLANT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. CR-12-765-1] V. HONORABLE WILLIAM A. STOREY, JUDGE STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE SUPPLEMENTAL ADDENDUM

ORDERED

KENNETH S. HIXSON, Judge

Appellant Charles Stutte was convicted of driving while intoxicated, first offense, and resisting arrest following a bench trial in Washington County Circuit Court. Appellant argues on appeal that both convictions should be reversed because the charges resulted from an illegal stop and because there is insufficient evidence to support either conviction. We cannot address the merits at this time because appellant failed to comply with the Arkansas Supreme

Court’s rules governing the contents of the abstract and addendum. Specifically, appellant must submit a supplemental addendum that includes the dash-board video recording of the pursuit and stop by the officer.

An appellant must include in the addendum those exhibits that are essential for our court to understand the case, including computer disks and DVDs, if applicable. Ark. Sup.

Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8)(A)(i). Here, the video recording of the officer’s pursuit and stop of appellant

Cite as 2013 Ark. App. 514 was made part of the record and was essential in the trial court’s consideration of his argument regarding an alleged illegal stop. In our de novo review of suppression issues, we necessarily would need to review the entirety of the evidence before the trial court, which would include the DVD of this recording. We will permit appellant seven calendar days to supplement his addendum to provide the video exhibit to the members of our court. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-

2(b)(4) (2012); see also Powell v. State, 2013 Ark. App. 149; Lewis v. State, 2012 Ark. App. 540.

Supplemental addendum ordered.

GRUBER and WOOD, JJ., agree.

Taylor Law Partners, LLP, by: William B. Putman, for appellants.

Dustin McDaniel, Att’y Gen., by: Laura Shue, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.