Jesse M. Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236 (5th Cir. 1986). · Go Syfert
Search
Jesse M. Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236 (5th Cir. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
110 citation events (81 in the last 25 years) across 13 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Clyce v. Butler, No. 22-10294 (5th Cir. Feb. 14, 2023)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 1237 Sixth amendment right to counsel does not apply in civil cases91 citing cases“the sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply to civil litigation.”4 citing courts quote it · 50 listed here
  • Clyce v. Butler, No. 22-10294 (5th Cir. Feb. 14, 2023).unpublished
    (right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply to civil proceedings)
  • Huckabay Props. v. NC Auto Parts, 2014 NV 23 (Nev. 2014).published 2 cites
    ([T]he sixth amendment right to ellective assistance of counsel does not apply to civil litigation.)
  • Huckabay Props. v. NC Auto Parts, 2014 NV 23 (Nev. 2014).published
    ([T]he sixth amendment right to ellective assistance of counsel does not apply to civil litigation.)
  • Cynthia Revels v. Mun. of Anchorage, a Mun. corp., No. S14373 (Alaska May 1, 2013).unpublished
    ([T]he sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply to civil litigation.)
  • F.R.Y. v. City of Hernando, MS, No. 24-60532 (5th Cir. May 13, 2025).unpublished
    But Fry points to no record support for the naked allegations contained therein, and we could find none. 11 See Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 , 322–23 (1986). 12 See, e.g., Luig v. N. Bay Enters., 817 F.3d 901 (5th Cir. 2016). 13…
  • Tipton v. Guerrero, No. 23-50570 (5th Cir. Feb. 24, 2025).unpublished 2 cites
    But the Sixth Amendment “right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply to civil litigation.” Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986).
  • Wright v. Transp. Commc'n, No. 23-20379 (5th Cir. Apr. 1, 2024).unpublished
    Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986). 2
  • Rhodes v. Saxton, No. 5:22-cv-00006 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 13, 2024).
    Player v. Reese, 300 F.App’x 310, 311 (5th Cir. 2008) (citing Sanchez v. United States Postal Service, 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986)).
  • Encalade v. Sylvia Biggs, No. 2:23-cv-03283 (E.D. La. Oct. 12, 2023).
    Therefore, the court denied Plaintiff’s motions for appointment of counsel as premature, specifically noting that Plaintiff may “re-urge his request after completion of the Court’s statutorily mandated screening review.”7 That review is st…
  • Edward Bedford v. Texas Dept of Transp., No. 19-20228 (5th Cir. Apr. 17, 2020).unpublished
    Sanchez v. USPS, 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986).
Show 40 more citing cases
  • Jeffrey Todd v. Reginald Hawkins, No. 17-51015 (5th Cir. Nov. 7, 2018).unpublished
    But because the Sixth Amendment “right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply to civil litigation,” San- chez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986), any deficient conduct by Todd’s attorney does not constitut…
  • Tessa Childress v. City of Charleston Police Dept., 706 F. App'x 814 (4th Cir. 2017).unpublished
    Taylor v. Dickel, 293 F.3d 427, 431 (8th Cir. 2002); Stanciel v. Gramley, 267 F.3d 575, 581 (7th Cir. 2001); Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986) (per curiam).
  • Sheldon Simmons v. Ryan Garrett, 705 F. App'x 323 (5th Cir. 2017).unpublished 2 cites
    See Federal Trade Comm’n v. Assail, Inc., 410 F.3d 256 , 267 (5th Cir. 2005); Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986).
  • Jeffery Fussell v. Darrell Vannoy, 691 F. App'x 212 (5th Cir. 2017).unpublished 2 cites
    Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986).
  • Sandra Williams v. Bd. of Educ. of PG Cnty., No. 13-1977 (4th Cir. Feb. 19, 2014).unpublished
    Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986); see Pitts v. Shinseki, 700 F.3d 1279, 1284-86 (Fed.
  • Venida Marshall v. Bd. of Educ. of PG Cnty., 554 F. App'x 246 (4th Cir. 2014).unpublished
    Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986); see Pitts v. Shinseki, 700 F.3d 1279, 1284-86 (Fed.Cir.2012) (collecting cases recognizing rule), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2856 , 186 L.Ed.2d 910 (2013).
  • Vallie Dean v. Bd. of Educ. of PG Cnty., 554 F. App'x 170 (4th Cir. 2014).unpublished
    Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986); see Pitts v. Shinseki, 700 F.3d 1279, 1284-86 (Fed.Cir.2012) (collecting cases recognizing rule), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2856 , 186 L.Ed.2d 910 (2013).
  • Ball-Rice v. Bd. of Educ., 546 F. App'x 279 (4th Cir. 2013).unpublished
    Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986); see Pitts v. Shinseki, 700 F.3d 1279, 1284-86 (Fed.Cir.2012) (collecting cases recognizing rule), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2856 , 186 L.Ed.2d 910 (2013).
  • Darlene Ball-Rice v. Bd. of Educ. of PG Cnty., No. 18-4785 (4th Cir. Nov. 21, 2013).unpublished
    Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986); see Pitts v. Shinseki, 700 F.3d 1279, 1284-86 (Fed.
  • Ronald J. Helferty v. United States, 113 Fed. Cl. 308 (Fed. Cl. 2013).published 2 cites
    In Williams v. Wynne, 533 F.3d 360, 369 (5th Cir.2008), the Fifth Circuit held that “the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel [does] not apply to the appellant’s non-criminal administrative discharge hearing.” Williams,…
  • Rhae Johnson v. The Sunshine House, Inc., 546 F. App'x 167 (4th Cir. 2013).unpublished
    Stanciel v. Gramley, 267 F.3d 575, 581 (7th Cir.2001); Glick v. Henderson, 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir.1988); Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986) (per curiam).
  • Rita Cheche v. Wittstat Title & Escrow Co., 482 F. App'x 844 (4th Cir. 2012).unpublished
    Glick v. Henderson, 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir.1988); Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986) (per curiam).
  • Corey Robinson v. Officer Mosher, 476 F. App'x 535 (4th Cir. 2012).unpublished
    Glick v. Henderson, 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir.1988); Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986).
  • Kelda Price v. Plantation Mgmt. Co., et a, 433 F. App'x 264 (5th Cir. 2011).unpublished
    Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986) (per curiam) (citations omitted).
  • Timberlake v. Teamsters Local Union No. 891, 428 F. App'x 299 (5th Cir. 2011).unpublished
    Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986) (per curiam). 16 .
  • United States v. $1,157,400.18 in U.S. Currency, 425 F. App'x 410 (5th Cir. 2011).unpublished
    The criminal conviction is not subject to review in this appeal from a civil forfeiture order and the “right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply to civil proceedings.” Sanchez v. United States Postal Service, 785 F.2d 1236, 1…
  • Geter v. Taharra, 429 F. App'x 265 (4th Cir. 2011).unpublished
    See Glick v. Henderson, 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir. 1988); Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986).
  • Michelle Brown v. HUD, No. 09-11196 (5th Cir. Jan. 27, 2011).unpublished
    Trade Comm’n v. Assail, Inc., 410 F.3d 256 , 267 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986) (per curiam)). 7
  • W.Y.N.N. v. Dallas Hous. Auth., 409 F. App'x 744 (5th Cir. 2011).unpublished
    Trade Comm'n v. Assail, Inc., 410 F.3d 256 , 267 (5th Cir.2005) (citing Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986) (per curiam)).
  • Monk v. Donahoe, 407 F. App'x 675 (4th Cir. 2011).unpublished
    AFFIRMED. * Because a litigant in a civil action has no constitutional or statutory right to effective assistance of counsel, Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986), we decline to consider Monk's claim of…
  • Stephen Gilbert v. French, 400 F. App'x 842 (5th Cir. 2010).unpublished
    The constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply in a civil case, see Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986), and any deficient conduct by counsel, therefore, would not constitute a basis…
  • Player v. Reese, 300 F. App'x 310 (5th Cir. 2008).unpublished
    Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986).
  • Williams v. Wynne, 533 F.3d 360 (5th Cir. 2008).published
    See Mantell v. Dept. of Justice, I.N.S., 798 F.2d 124, 127 (5th Cir.1986); Sanchez v. United States Postal Service, 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986). 6 Second, the AFBCMR concluded that even assuming the Sixth Amendment did apply, the ap…
  • Nicholson v. Spring Sand & Clay LP, 229 F. App'x 304 (5th Cir. 2007).unpublished
    Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986).
  • Gambino v. Orleans Par. Crim. Sheriff's Off., 186 F. App'x 488 (5th Cir. 2006).unpublished
    Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986).
  • Nelson v. Boeing Com., 446 F.3d 1118 (10th Cir. 2006).published
    See Bell v. Eastman Kodak Co., 214 F.3d 798, 802 (7th Cir.2000); Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986) (per curiam).
  • Skinner v. Lee, 166 F. App'x 140 (5th Cir. 2006).unpublished
    Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986).
  • Williams v. Gonzales, 157 F. App'x 737 (5th Cir. 2005).unpublished
    Sanchez *739 v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986).
  • Lawler v. Am. Bldg. Contractors, Inc., 149 F. App'x 131 (4th Cir. 2005).unpublished
    Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986).
  • Fed Trd Cmsn v. Assail Inc, No. 03-51461 (5th Cir. July 18, 2005).published
    See Goonsuwan v. Ashcroft, 252 F.3d 383 , 385 n.2 (5th Cir. 2001) (“It is well settled that, because deportation hearings are considered civil in nature, there is no Sixth Amendment right to counsel.”); Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv…
  • Pryor v. Thaler, 134 F. App'x 718 (5th Cir. 2005).unpublished 2 cites
    Pryor contends that his action was dismissed due to the questionable strategy of his appointed counsel. “[T]he sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply to civil litigation.” Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785…
  • Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Assail, Inc., Robert M. Draskovich v. Robb Evans & Assocs., Llc, Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Assail, Inc., Dean Y. Kajioka v. Robb Evans & Assocs., LLC, 410 F.3d 256 (5th Cir. 2005).published
    See Goonsuwan v. Ashcroft, 252 F.3d 383 , 385 n. 2 (5th Cir.2001) ("It is well settled that, because deportation hearings are considered civil in nature, there is no Sixth Amendment right to counsel."); Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv…
  • Fed. Trade Comm'n v. Assail, Inc., 410 F.3d 256 (5th Cir. 2005).published
    See Goonsuwan v. Ashcroft, 252 F.3d 383 , 385 a. 2 (5th Cir.2001) ("It is well settled that, because deportation hearings are considered civil in nature, there is no Sixth Amendment right to counsel."); Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv…
  • Wargo v. Bowles, No. 97-11025 (5th Cir. Mar. 4, 2004).unpublished
    Safety Bd., 993 F.2d 516, 521 (5th Cir. 1993); Sanchez v. United States Postal Service, 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986).
  • Pierce v. Mullins Police Dept, No. 03-2468 (4th Cir. Feb. 24, 2004).unpublished
    See MacCuish v. United States, 844 F.2d 733, 735 (10th Cir. 1988); Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986).
  • Browning v. Harper, 82 F. App'x 852 (4th Cir. 2003).unpublished
    Sanchez v. United States Postal Service, 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986).
  • Green v. Potter, 80 F. App'x 294 (4th Cir. 2003).unpublished
    See, e.g., Glick v. Henderson, 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir.1988); Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986).
  • Murungi v. Mercedes Benz Credit, No. 01-30329 (5th Cir. Oct. 25, 2001).unpublished
    No. 01-30329 -2- Corporation’s (MBCC’s) motion to dismiss based on the lack of opposition to that motion. “[T]he sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply to civil proceedings.” Sanchez v. United States Postal…
  • Gage v. United States, No. 98-31389 (5th Cir. Aug. 27, 1999).unpublished
    Sanchez v. U.S. Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986).
  • S. Christian Leadership Conf. v. Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, 61 F. Supp. 2d 499 (E.D. La. 1999).published
    Dist., 911 F.2d 1165, 1166 (5th Cir.1990); Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir.1986). *507 Even in the criminal context, there are limits on the type of legal assistance an indigent may obtain.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jesse M. SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Defendant-Appellee
85-2296.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Mar 21, 1986.
Published opinion
785 F.2d 1236
1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23198
Jesse M. Sanchez, pro se., Helen M. Eversberg, U.S. Atty., and Jack B. Moynihan, Asst. U.S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Wyneva Johnson and Lori J. Dym, Office of Labor Law, U.S. Postal Service, Washington, D.C., for U.S. Postal Service.
Rubin, Reavley, Hill.
Cited by 97 opinions  |  Published
PER CURIAM:

Plaintiff Jesse Sanchez appeals from a judgment entered in favor of the defendant United States Postal Service (Postal Service) in this civil rights case. Sanchez presents a single issue in his appeal: whether the alleged ineffective assistance rendered by his trial counsel entitles him to a new trial. Finding Sanchez’ contention in direct contravention with established circuit precedent, we affirm.

I.

Sanchez, an employee of the Postal Service, filed this civil action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, specifically 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16. Sanchez alleged that the Postal Service discriminated against him on the basis of his national origin when the Postal Service did not promote him. Following a bench trial, at which a private attorney specializing in civil rights litigation represented Sanchez, the district court held that the Postal Service had articulated a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for Sanchez’ nonselection and that Sanchez had failed to establish that the reason was merely a pretext for discrimination. The district court entered judgment in favor of the Postal Service. Sanchez then filed his pro se appeal with[*1237] this court, alleging that his trial counsel failed to provide him with effective assistance of counsel and requesting that we grant him a new trial.

II.

Sanchez bases his argument that his counsel denied him effective assistance of counsel on a faulty premise. Sanchez assumes that a constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel exists. Sanchez reads the sixth amendment as providing this right; however, the sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply to civil proceedings. See United States v. White, 589 F.2d 1283, 1285 n. 4 (5th Cir.1979); United States v. Rogers, 534 F.2d 1134 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 940, 97 S.Ct. 355, 50 L.Ed.2d 309 (1976).

White and Rogers, rather than explicitly stating that a right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply in civil cases, go only as far as stating that the “stringent standards” applicable to the right to effective assistance of counsel in criminal cases do not apply in civil cases. However, a reading of the two cases reveals that the cases squarely stand for the proposition that the sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply in civil proceedings. In neither case did the court apply sixth amendment standards to the alleged errors of counsel. In case any doubt still exists, we now expressly hold that the sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel does not apply to civil litigation. See Wolfolk v. Rivera, 729 F.2d 1114, 1120 (7th Cir.1984); Allen v. Barnes Hospital, 721 F.2d 643, 644 (8th Cir.1983); Mekdeci v. Merrell National Laboratories, 711 F.2d 1510, 1522-23 (11th Cir.1983).

Since no right to effective assistance of counsel exists, we need not consider the alleged errors committed by Sanchez’ attorney. If Sanchez’ attorney did mishandle the case, Sanchez may have a remedy against his attorney in the form of a malpractice suit. Watson v. Moss, 619 F.2d 775, 776 (8th Cir.1980). Sanchez’ potential cause of action against his attorney remains separate and distinct from his civil rights suit against the Postal Service; therefore, we cannot grant him any relief in this proceeding.

For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.