People v. Molina, 180 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2020). · Go Syfert
Search
People v. Molina, 180 A.D.3d 564 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2020). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
6 citation events (6 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Am. Express Natl. Bank v. Kleiman, 2024 NY Slip Op 33113(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2024)
How cited ↗
Cited for
At page 565 cited at this page2 citing cases
  • Am. Express Natl. Bank v. Kleiman, 2024 NY Slip Op 33113(U) (N.Y. Sup. Ct., New York Cty. 2024).unpublished
    NO. 19 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/06/2024 Grassi & Co., CPAS, P.C. v Honka, 180 AD3d 564, 565 (1st Dept 2020).
  • Holder v. Jacob, 216 N.Y.S.3d 134 (N.Y. App. Div. 1st Dep't 2024).published
    Whether or not defendants may ultimately be able to demonstrate that they are entitled to immunity, it is premature to deem the analysis completed at this juncture ( see Miglino v Bally Total Fitness of Greater N.Y., Inc ., 20 NY3d 342, 35…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
People
v.
Molina
11086 3211N/16.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Feb 20, 2020.
Published opinion
180 A.D.3d 564
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published
People v Molina (2020 NY Slip Op 01261)
People v Molina
2020 NY Slip Op 01261
Decided on February 20, 2020
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 20, 2020
Renwick, J.P., Mazzarelli, Gesmer, Kern, JJ.

11086 3211N/16

[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Juan Molina, Defendant-Appellant.


Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Ronald Alfano of counsel), for appellant. Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Rebecca Hausner of counsel), for respondent. [*~564–565]

An appeal having been taken to this Court by the above-named appellant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, New York County (Michael Sonberg, J.), rendered January 31, 2017,

Said appeal having been argued by counsel for the respective parties, due deliberation having been had thereon, and finding the sentence not excessive,

It is unanimously ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same is hereby affirmed.