Ronald E. Payne, Individually & on Behalf of Himself & Others Similarly Situated v. Richard E. Lyng, Individually & as Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Agric. v. James J. Collins, Movant-Appellant-Intervenor, 799 F.2d 664 (11th Cir. 1986). · Go Syfert
Ronald E. Payne, Individually & on Behalf of Himself & Others Similarly Situated v. Richard E. Lyng, Individually & as Sec'y of the United States Dep't of Agric. v. James J. Collins, Movant-Appellant-Intervenor, 799 F.2d 664 (11th Cir. 1986). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
1 citation event across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Ronald E. Payne, Individually and on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated
v.
Richard E. Lyng, Individually and as Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture v. James J. Collins, Movant-Appellant-Intervenor
81-5365.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
Sep 15, 1986.
799 F.2d 664
1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 30501
Published

799 F.2d 664

Ronald E. PAYNE, Individually and on behalf of himself and
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Richard E. LYNG, Individually and as Secretary of the United
States Department of Agriculture, et al.,
Defendants-Appellants,
v.
James J. COLLINS, Movant-Appellant-Intervenor.

No. 81-5365.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.

Sept. 15, 1986.

Richard Olderman, Robert E. Kopp, Washington, D.C., for Block, FHA, Dept. of Agriculture.

William R. King, Haas, Holland, Lipshutz, Levison & Gibert, Atlanta, Ga., for Collins, movant-appellant-intervenor.

J. Victor Africano, Live Oak, Fla., Moorey, Seal & Garvin, Theodore L. Tripp, Jr., Fort Myers, Fla., for plaintiffs-appellees.

On Remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.

Before GODBOLD and CLARK, Circuit Judges, and HENDERSON, Senior Circuit Judge.

BY THE COURT:

1

The district court judgment in this case was affirmed by this court in Ronald E. Payne v. John R. Block, 714 F.2d 1510 (1983), 721 F.2d 741 (1983) and 751 F.2d 1191 (1985). The judgment of this court has now been reversed by the Supreme Court of the United States. Richard E. Lyng v. Ronald E. Payne, --- U.S. ---, 106 S.Ct. 2333, 90 L.Ed.2d 921 (1986).

2

WHEREUPON, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the district court is REVERSED, and this cause is REMANDED to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States.