Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29 (6th Cir. 1987). · Go Syfert
Search
Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29 (6th Cir. 1987). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
20 citation events (1 in the last 25 years) across 7 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Alex LeFever v. James Ferguson (ca6, 2014-06-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 13 distinct citers. How cited ↗
cited Cited as authority (rule) Alex LeFever v. James Ferguson
6th Cir. · 2014 · confidence medium
E.g., Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29, 30 (6th Cir.1987) (per curiam).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Latrieste Restaurant And Cabaret, Inc. v. Village Of Port Chester
2d Cir. · 1996 · confidence medium
Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29, 30 (6th Cir.1987) (per curiam); Thompson v. Betts, 754 F.2d 1243, 1246 (5th Cir.1985).
cited Cited as authority (rule) LaTrieste Restaurant & Cabaret, Inc. v. Village of Port Chester
2d Cir. · 1996 · confidence medium
Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29, 30 (6th Cir.1987) (per curiam); Thompson v. Betts, 754 F.2d 1243, 1246 (5th Cir.1985).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Frances Winfrey, Dr. v. The School Board of Dade County, Florida, Dr. Tee Greer, Russell Wheatley
11th Cir. · 1995 · confidence medium
Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29, 29-30 (6th Cir.1987) (order granting absolute or qualified immunity against all but one defendant is not an appealable final decision); Theis v. Smith, 827 F.2d 260, 261 (7th Cir.1987) (order granting summary judgment based on judicial immunity not reviewable where claims remain against other defendants).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Clemens v. Kansas
10th Cir. · 1991 · confidence medium
See Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 335 (9th Cir.1990); Theis v. Smith, 827 F.2d 260, 261 (7th Cir.1987); Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29, 30 (6th Cir.1987); Thompson v. Betts, 754 F.2d 1243, 1246 (5th Cir.1985).
discussed Cited as authority (rule) Clemens v. State Of Kansas
10th Cir. · 1991 · confidence medium
See Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 335 (9th Cir.1990); Theis v. Smith, 827 F.2d 260, 261 (7th Cir.1987); Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29, 30 (6th Cir.1987); Thompson v. Betts, 754 F.2d 1243, 1246 (5th Cir.1985).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Asser v. Corrigan
6th Cir. · 1991 · confidence medium
Coe by Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29, 30 (6th Cir.1987) (per curiam).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Karim Abdul Rahim v. W. Jeff Reynolds, Hartwell Hatfield, Bobby Chessor, David Westbrooks
6th Cir. · 1991 · confidence medium
Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29, 30 (6th Cir.1987) (per curiam).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Branson v. City Of Los Angeles
9th Cir. · 1990 · confidence medium
Accordingly, it does not fall under the collateral order doctrine. 1 See Theis v. Smith, 827 F.2d 260, 261 (7th Cir.1987); Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29, 30 (6th Cir.1987).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Branson v. City of Los Angeles
9th Cir. · 1990 · confidence medium
Accordingly, it does not fall under the collateral order doctrine. 1 See Theis v. Smith, 827 F.2d 260, 261 (7th Cir.1987); Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29, 30 (6th Cir.1987).
cited Cited as authority (rule) Alonzo Gardner, Jr. v. Michigan Department of Corrections, Richard Dalmonte
6th Cir. · 1989 · confidence medium
Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29, 30 (6th Cir.1987) (per curiam). 4 It is ORDERED that the appeal be, and it hereby is, dismissed.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Daniel Ray Melson v. Nelson County, Kentucky, Larry D. Raikes Thomas A. Donan
6th Cir. · 1989 · confidence medium
Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29, 30 (6th Cir.1987) (per curiam).
cited Cited "see" Grayson v. Board of Educ. of Jefferson County, Ky.
6th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See Coe v. Ziegler, 817 F.2d 29 (6th Cir.1987).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Christopher Coe, by His Next Friend Michael Coe Danny & Sondra Smith, by Their Next Friend Mary Smith
v.
Linda Ziegler Officer Robert Connelly, Officer Jeffrey R. Hunt, Police Officers--Cincinnati Police Department John P. O'connor, Individually and in Capacity as Judge, Hamilton Co. Juvenile Court, Kathleen Byrne
87-3035.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Apr 24, 1987.
817 F.2d 29
1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5321
Cited by 3 opinions  |  Published

817 F.2d 29

Christopher COE, by his next friend Michael COE; Danny &
Sondra Smith, by their next friend Mary Smith,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Linda ZIEGLER; Officer Robert Connelly, Officer Jeffrey R.
Hunt, Police Officers--Cincinnati Police Department; John
P. O'Connor, individually and in capacity as Judge, Hamilton
Co. Juvenile Court, Defendants-Appellees,
Kathleen Byrne, et al., Defendants.

No. 87-3035.

United States Court of Appeals,
Sixth Circuit.

Submitted March 30, 1987.
Decided April 24, 1987.

John H. Metz, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Coe.

Frank J. Wasserman, Legal Aid Society, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Smith.

Michael E. Maundrell, Rendigs, Fry, Kiely & Dennis, Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendants-appellees.

Hugh O. Frost, II, Asst. City Solicitor, Cincinnati, Ohio, Richard A. Castellini, City Solicitor, for Connelly & Hunt.

Before KEITH, KENNEDY and RYAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

1

The Plaintiffs appeal an order of the district court granting absolute or qualified immunity to four of the five Defendants in this civil action for damages and declaratory relief. The Defendants now move to dismiss the appeal on grounds that an order granting immunity is not a final, appealable order under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291. The Plaintiffs have filed a response.

2

The United States Supreme Court has recently held that the denial of a motion to dismiss based on a claim of qualified or absolute immunity is an appealable final decision. Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 105 S.Ct. 2806, 86 L.Ed.2d 411 (1985); Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 102 S.Ct. 2690, 73 L.Ed.2d 349 (1982). In so holding, the Court reasoned that a party entitled to immunity has the right to be free from the burden of going to trial. Because the Mitchell rationale does not apply when immunity has been granted this order lacks finality. The policy against piecemeal appeals is applicable, and therefore,

3

It is ORDERED that the motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.