People v. Stevenson, 2021 NY Slip Op 04565 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021). · Go Syfert
People v. Stevenson, 2021 NY Slip Op 04565 (N.Y. App. Div. 2021). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
4 citation events across 1 distinct court.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
People
v.
Stevenson
Ind. No. 160/18.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.
Jul 28, 2021.
2021 NY Slip Op 04565
Cited by 2 opinions  |  Published
People v Stevenson (2021 NY Slip Op 04565)
People v Stevenson
2021 NY Slip Op 04565
Decided on July 28, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 28, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
REINALDO E. RIVERA
ROBERT J. MILLER
COLLEEN D. DUFFY, JJ.

2019-11904
(Ind. No. 160/18)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Ahquan Stevenson, appellant.




Mary Zugibe Raleigh, Warwick, NY, for appellant.

David M. Hoovler, District Attorney, Middletown, NY (Andrew R. Kass and Edward D. Saslaw of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (William L. DeProspo, J.), rendered September 16, 2019, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently agreed to a waiver that limited the scope of his right to appeal (see People v Thomas, 34 NY3d 545, 564). The defendant's valid waiver precludes appellate review of his challenge to the County Court's suppression determination (see People v Sanders, 25 NY3d 337, 342).

Contrary to the defendant's remaining contention, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying, without a hearing, his motion, in effect, to withdraw his plea of guilty (see People v Rodriguez, 270 AD2d 434, 434-435).

MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, MILLER and DUFFY, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court