green
Positive treatment
published
4.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Cited for
Other citing cases
- Martin v. Bowen, 670 F. Supp. 295 (E.D. Cal. 1987).published
- KFC Corp. v. Kamal, No. 3:20-cv-00279 (W.D. Ky. Dec. 22, 2020).
- Perry D. Myrick v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 872 F.2d 1027 (6th Cir. 1989).unpublished
- Pierce v. Underwood, 487 U.S. 552 (1988).published
- Edwards v. McMahon, 834 F.2d 796 (9th Cir. 1987).published
- Helene Edwards Christine Streicher Diamond, & Helen Edwards Christine Streicher Diamond California Coalition of Welfare Rights Organizations Sharon Lilly Judith A. Tillings Plaintiffs-Intervenors/appellees v. Linda S. McMahon Dir. of the State Dep't of Soc. Servs. Dep't of Soc. Servs., an Agency of the State of California Michael Franchetti, Dir. of the Dep't of Fin. of the State of California Dept. Of Fin., an Agency of the State of California Defendants/counter-Claimants, Third-Party v. Otis R. Bowen, Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., Defendant-Third-Party, 834 F.2d 796 (3d Cir. 1987).published
- Spruil v. Bowen, 691 F. Supp. 302 (M.D. Fla. 1988).published
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Samuel RIDDLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee
v.
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee
86-5228.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
Jul 9, 1987.
Published opinion
Lively, Engel, Keith, Merritt, Kennedy, Martin, Jones, Krupansky, Wellford, Milburn, Guy, Nelson, Ryan, Boggs, Norris.
Cited by 22 opinions | Published
ORDER
A majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service have voted for rehearing of this case en banc. Sixth Circuit Rule 14 provides as follows:
The effect of the granting of a hearing en banc shall be to vacate the previous opinion and judgment of this Court, to stay the mandate and to restore the case on the docket as a pending appeal.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the previous decision and judgment of this Court, 817 F.2d 1238, is vacated, the mandate is stayed and this case is restored to the docket as a pending appeal.
The Clerk will direct the parties to file supplemental briefs and will schedule this case for oral argument as soon as practicable.